The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1 · Cited by 2,645
Power, politics, and MIS implementation
Markus, M. L. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358141.358148 · Cited by 2,224
The Evolution of E‐Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?
Moon, M. J. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196 · Cited by 1,959
Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective
Orlikowski, W. J. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.63 · Cited by 1,952
Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4209 · Cited by 1,303
The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government
Thomas, J. C. (2003) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mug010 · Cited by 581
Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-2745 · Cited by 489
Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective
Unpan (2002) · Cited by 473
A two-stage model of e-government growth: Theories and empirical evidence for U.S. cities
Reddick, C. G. (2004) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2003.11.004 · Cited by 321
Information systems management and strategy formulation: the ‘stages of growth’ model revisited
Galliers, R. D., & Sutherland, A. R. (1991) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.1991.tb00030.x · Cited by 295
Cited by
e-Government Adoption Model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels
Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006 · Cited by 581
Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325
Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008 · Cited by 311
Realizing joined-up government — Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2009) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.007 · Cited by 287
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-248
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101241669
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 122.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
- The paper
- Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
