The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector
Weiss, J. A., Osborne, D., Gaebler, T., & Review, N. P. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258896 · Cited by 4,540
The New Governance: Governing without Government
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x · Cited by 4,317
Reinventing Government: How the En-trepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(94)90023-x · Cited by 2,983
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1 · Cited by 2,645
Osborne, D. (1993) · Public Productivity & Management Review · doi:10.2307/3381012 · Cited by 2,273
Osborne, S. P. (2006) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719030600853022 · Cited by 2,034
Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services
Bovaird, T. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x · Cited by 1,971
The Evolution of E‐Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?
Moon, M. J. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00196 · Cited by 1,959
From old public administration to new public management
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994) · Public Money & Management · doi:10.1080/09540969409387823 · Cited by 1,450
Trust and risk in e-government adoption
Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002 · Cited by 1,235
Cited by
Criado, J. I., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-07-2019-0178 · Cited by 339
Factors influencing the adoption of e-Government services in Mauritius
Lallmahomed, M. Z. I., Lallmahomed, N., & Lallmahomed, G. M. (2017) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.003 · Cited by 264
Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions
Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681 · Cited by 193
Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk.
Xie, Q., Song, W., Peng, X., & Shabbir, M. (2017) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2015-0141 · Cited by 167
Chohan, S. R., & Hu, G. (2022) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 31
- Pages
- S63-S71
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026861302
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 97.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
- The paper
- Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
