The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
Cited by
An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA)
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Janssen, M., Lal, B., Williams, M. D., & Clement, M. (2017) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001 · Cited by 622
Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities
Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016 · Cited by 459
Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization
Barberá, P. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.004 · Cited by 373
Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website
Anthopoulos, L., Reddick, C. G., Giannakidou, I., & Mavridis, N. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.07.003 · Cited by 325
Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020) · Social Media and Democracy · doi:10.1017/9781108890960.003 · Cited by 284
Evaluating the use and impact of Web 2.0 technologies in local government
Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z., & Weerakkody, V. (2015) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.004 · Cited by 152
Public employees’ use of social media: Its impact on need satisfaction and intrinsic work motivation
Demircioglu, M. A., & Chen, C.-A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.008 · Cited by 129
Chen, Y., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497 · Cited by 66
Does E-Government Raise Effectiveness and Efficiency?: Examining the Cross-National Effect
Nam, T. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070107 · Cited by 53
Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Daowd, A. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101458 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., & Flores, F.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-132
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075669799
- Cited by
- 902
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 398.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
