The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J., & Backhaus, U. (2006) · The European Heritage in Economics and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,506
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,264
(1934) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 7,609
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy.
Robinson, J., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1943) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2226398 · Cited by 6,529
Business intelligence and analytics: from big data to big impact
Chen, H., Chiang, R. H. L., & Storey, V. C. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703503 · Cited by 6,250
The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a theme
Hood, C. (1995) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)e0001-w · Cited by 3,815
Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011) · Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times · doi:10.1145/2037556.2037602 · Cited by 2,802
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400826339 · Cited by 2,657
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s0740-624x(01)00066-1 · Cited by 2,645
Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government
Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 · Cited by 2,062
Cited by
Smart cities: Advances in research—An information systems perspective
Ismagilova, E., Hughes, L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Raman, K. R. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.004 · Cited by 848
Sousa, W. G. D., Melo, E. R. P. D., Bermejo, P. H. D. S., Farias, R. A. S., & Gomes, A. O. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004 · Cited by 501
Anticipatory innovation governance: Shaping the future through proactive policy making
(2020) · OECD Working Papers on Public Governance · doi:10.1787/cce14d80-en · Cited by 303
Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917 · Cited by 266
The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making
de Bruijn, H., Warnier, M., & Janssen, M. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101666 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Bertot, J., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 211-222
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2411346287
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 89.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004
- The paper
- Bertot, J., Estevez, E., & Janowski, T. (2016). Universal and contextualized public services: Digital public service innovation framework. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.05.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
