Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The good, the bad and the ugly: Three faces of social media usage by local governments

Silva, Patrícia, Tavares, António F., Silva, Tiago, Lameiras, Mariana·2019·Government Information Quarterly
DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Ahn, 2011, Adoption of e-communication applications in U.S. municipalities: The role of political environment, bureaucratic structure, and the nature of applications, The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 428, 10.1177/0275074010377654 · DOI
  2. Aladwani, 2018, Towards a theory of SocioCitizenry: Quality anticipation, trust configuration, and approved adaptation of governmental social media, International Journal of Information Management, 43, 261, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.08.009 · DOI
  3. Althaus, 2000, Patterns of internet and traditional news media use in a networked community, Political Communication, 17, 21, 10.1080/105846000198495 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bonsón, 2013, A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page, Online Information Review, 37, 787, 10.1108/OIR-03-2012-0054 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bonsón, 2015, Citizens' engagement on local governments' facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe, Government Information Quarterly, 32, 52, 10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bonsón, 2017, Facebook practices in Western European municipalities: An empirical analysis of activity and citizens' engagement, Administration and Society, 49, 320, 10.1177/0095399714544945 · DOI
  7. Bonsón, 2012, Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 123, 10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Carrizales, 2008, Functions of E-government: A study of municipal practices, State & Local Government Review, 40, 12, 10.1177/0160323X0804000102 · DOI
  9. Chalmers, 2014, In over their heads: Public consultation, administrative capacity and legislative duration in the European Union, European Union Politics, 15, 595, 10.1177/1465116514529849 · DOI
  10. da Cruz, 2016, Measuring local government transparency, Public Management Review, 18, 866, 10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572 · DOI · Paper page
  11. De Ceuninck, 2010, Municipal amalgamations in the Low Countries: Same problems, different solutions, Local Government Studies, 36, 803, 10.1080/03003930.2010.522082 · doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.522082
  12. Djerf-Pierre, 2016, Mediatised local government: Social media activity and media strategies among local government officials 1989-2010, Policy and Politics, 44, 59, 10.1332/030557315X14434624683411 · DOI
  13. Domínguez, 2011, Determining factors of e-government development: A worldwide national approach, International Public Management Journal, 14, 218, 10.1080/10967494.2011.597152 · DOI
  14. Ellison, 2013, Developing political conversations?, Information, Communication & Society, 16, 878, 10.1080/1369118X.2012.740495 · DOI
  15. Ellison, 2014, Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy, Local Government Studies, 40, 21, 10.1080/03003930.2013.799066 · DOI
  16. Enli, 2013, Personalised campaigns in party-centered politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication, Information, Communication & Society, 16, 757, 10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Foster, 2017, Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans' confidence in government, European Union Politics, 18, 511, 10.1177/1465116517723499 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fox, 2014, Gender and local government: A comparison of women and Men City managers, Public Administration Review, 59, 231, 10.2307/3109951 · DOI
  19. Gallego-Álvarez, 2010, Are determining factors of municipal E-government common to a worldwide municipal view? An intra-country comparison, Government Information Quarterly, 27, 423, 10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.011 · DOI
  20. García, 2010, Determinants of online reporting of accounting information by Spanish local government authorities, Local Government Studies, 36, 679, 10.1080/03003930.2010.506980 · doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.506980
  21. Grimmelikhuijsen, 2016, Developing and testing an integrative framework for open government adoption in local governments, Public Administration Review, 77, 579, 10.1111/puar.12689 · DOI
  22. Grover, 2018, Polarization and acculturation in the 2016 US presidential election: Can twitter analytics predict changes in voting preferences?, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
  23. Guillamón, 2016, Factors influencing social media use in local governments: The case of Italy and Spain, Government Information Quarterly, 33, 460, 10.1016/j.giq.2016.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hanssen, 2007, ICT in Norwegian local government - empowering the politicians?, Local Government Studies, 33, 355, 10.1080/03003930701289562 · DOI
  25. Haro-de-Rosario, 2018, Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook?, New Media & Society, 20, 29, 10.1177/1461444816645652 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hofmann, 2013, What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 387, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.013 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Jalali, 2014, For whom the bailout tolls? The implications of the 2013 local elections for the Portuguese party system, South European Society and Politics, 19, 235, 10.1080/13608746.2014.913340 · doi:10.1080/13608746.2014.913340
  28. Kahne, 2018, The political significance of social media activity and social networks, Political Communication, 1
  29. Kapoor, 2018, Advances in social media research: Past, present and future, Information Systems Frontiers, 20, 531, 10.1007/s10796-017-9810-y · DOI · Paper page
  30. Katz, 2013, Political and developmental correlates of social media participation in government: A global survey of National Leadership Websites, International Journal of Public Administration, 36, 1, 10.1080/01900692.2012.713286 · DOI
  31. Kavanaugh, 2012, Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 480, 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kleinhans, 2015, Using social media and Mobile technologies to Foster engagement and self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance, Planning Practice and Research, 30, 237, 10.1080/02697459.2015.1051320 · DOI
  33. Larsson, 2014, “Of course we are on Facebook”: Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians, European Journal of Communication, 29, 653, 10.1177/0267323114531383 · DOI
  34. Larsson, 2018, Out with the old, in with the new? Perceptions of social (and other) media by local and regional Norwegian politicians, New Media & Society, 20, 219, 10.1177/1461444816661549 · DOI
  35. Lee, 2012, An open government maturity model for social media-based public engagement, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 492, 10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Lilleker, 2017, What drives political participation? Motivations and mobilization in a digital age, Political Communication, 34, 21, 10.1080/10584609.2016.1225235 · DOI
  37. López, 2011, Transparencia financiera de los municipios españoles. Utilidad y factores relacionados, Auditoría Pública, 55, 109
  38. Martín, 2015, Using twitter for dialogic communication: Local government strategies in the European Union, Local Government Studies, 41, 421, 10.1080/03003930.2014.991866 · DOI
  39. Mergel, 2016, Social media institutionalization in the U.S. federal government, Government Information Quarterly, 33, 142, 10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.002 · DOI
  40. Milio, 2007, Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in southern Italy, Regional Studies, 41, 429, 10.1080/00343400601120213 · doi:10.1080/00343400601120213
  41. Moon, 2005, Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level, Information Systems Journal, 15, 43, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00185.x · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mossberger, 2013, Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 351, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Musso, 2000, Designing web technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good management or good democracy?, Political Communication, 17, 1, 10.1080/105846000198486 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Norris, 2013, Local E-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change?, Public Administration Review, 73, 165, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02647.x · DOI · Paper page
  45. Norris, 2003, Preaching to the converted?: Pluralism, participation and party websites, Party Politics, 9, 21, 10.1177/135406880391003 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Oliveira, 2013, Social media use in local government: Linkage of technology, task, and organizational context, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 397, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Omar, 2014, Social media use in local government: An Australian perspective, International Journal of Public Administration, 37, 666, 10.1080/01900692.2014.903270 · DOI
  48. Reddick, 2005, Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers?, Government Information Quarterly, 22, 38, 10.1016/j.giq.2004.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Reddick, 2013, Social media adoption at the American grass roots: Web 2.0 or 1.5?, Government Information Quarterly, 30, 498, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.011 · DOI
  50. Shiau, 2018, Examining the core knowledge on Facebook, International Journal of Information Management, 43, 52, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.06.006 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Song, 2016, Citizens use of social media in Government, perceived transparency, and Trust in Government, Public Performance and Management Review, 39, 430, 10.1080/15309576.2015.1108798 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Tavares, 2013, So close, yet so far away? The effects of city size, density and growth on local civic participation, Journal of Urban Affairs, 35, 283, 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00638.x · DOI
  53. Tavares, 2017, Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework, Government Information Quarterly, 1
  54. Tavares, 2013, The supply of political and administrative instruments of participation: An empirical analysis of local government choices, Revista del CLAD Reforma y Democracia, 55, 141
  55. Tolbert, 2008, Institutions, policy innovation, and E-government in the American states, Public Administration Review, 68, 549, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x · DOI · Paper page
  56. Torcal, 2014, The decline of political Trust in Spain and Portugal: Economic performance or political responsiveness?, American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 1542, 10.1177/0002764214534662 · DOI
  57. Vaccari, 2017, Online mobilization in comparative perspective: Digital appeals and political engagement in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, Political Communication, 34, 69, 10.1080/10584609.2016.1201558 · DOI
  58. Wang, 2016, Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities, The American Review of Public Administration, 46, 292, 10.1177/0275074014553462 · DOI
  59. Warren, 2014, Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 291, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Silva, P., Tavares, A. F., Silva, T., & Lameiras, M.
Venue
Government Information Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-07
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
469-479
ISSN
0740-624X
DOI
10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.006
Cited by
90
References
1
Language
en
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund (UID/CPO/0758/2019)
  • Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  • Portuguese Ministry of Education and Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.