The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, bureaucratic and infrastructural barriers endemic to developing nations may alter returns (Pittaway and Montazemi 2020).”
From How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility (2024) · cites this paper as Pittaway and Montazemi 2020
In the citing paper
“While the influence of advanced analytics, automation, and artificial intelligence on innovation and responsiveness has achieved extensive study in Western contexts, far less scholarship examines digitally enabled performance linkages within developing country public institutions undertaking e-governance initiatives (Haug et al. 2023; Pittaway and Montazemi 2020).”
From How Do Digital Capabilities Affect Organizational Performance in the Public Sector? The Mediating Role of the Organizational Agility (2024) · cites this paper as Pittaway and Montazemi 2020
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,639
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda
Vial, G. (2019) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 · Cited by 7,337
(2014) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446294406.n148 · Cited by 7,272
Neufeld, A., & Ryan, A. G. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation · doi:10.3138/cjpe.3.006 · Cited by 5,906
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fitzgerald, 2013, Embracing digital technology: A new strategic imperative, MIT Sloan Management Review, 55, 1
- Kohli, 2011, Digital transformation in latecomer industries, MIS Quarterly Executive, 10
- O'Neill, 2015, Supercity IT spending revealed, SAP the big winner, ZDNet, 26, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mansoor, M. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101597 · Cited by 451
Digitally-induced change in the public sector: a systematic review and research agenda
Haug, N., Dan, S., & Mergel, I. (2024) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917 · Cited by 266
Tangi, L., Janssen, M., Benedetti, M., & Noci, G. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102356 · Cited by 265
Mora, L., Gerli, P., Ardito, L., & Petruzzelli, A. M. (2023) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717 · Cited by 203
Overcoming barriers to digital government: mapping the strategies of digital champions
Wilson, C., & Mergel, I. (2022) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101681 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittaway, J. J., & Montazemi, A. R.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- ORCID
- Montazemi, Ali Reza
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 101474
- ISSN
- 0740-624X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022446025
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 67.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- discovery.ucl.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Government Information Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Smart Cities and Technologies
- Keywords
- digital transformation, local government, public service delivery, public-private partnerships, knowledge transfer, digital public services, barriers to digitalization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
