The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of chatbots on public service provision: A qualitative interview study with citizens and public service providers
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Their adoption brings unique challenges, including the complexity of GenAI projects and the imperative to ensure transparency, fairness, and public value (Larsen & Følstad, 2024).”
From Exploring the Challenges of Generative AI on Public Sector Communication in Europe (2025) · cites this paper as Larsen & Følstad, 2024
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2020) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8 · Cited by 1,911
The Ethics of AI Ethics -- An Evaluation of Guidelines
Hagendorff, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.03425 · Cited by 1,907
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30 · Cited by 788
Self-citationTransforming the communication between citizens and government through AI-guided chatbots
Androutsopoulou, A., Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.10.001 · Cited by 567
Madan, R., & Ashok, M. (2023) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774 · Cited by 468
The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance
Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.011 · Cited by 363
Public value creation in digital government
Panagiotopoulos, P., Klievink, B., & Cordella, A. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.101421 · Cited by 265
Value positions viewed through the lens of automated decision-making: The case of social services
Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.004 · Cited by 169
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Amiri, 2022, Chatbot use cases in the Covid-19 public health response, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29, 1000, 10.1093/jamia/ocac014 · DOI
- Aoki, 2020, An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector, Government Information Quarterly, 37, 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490 · DOI · Paper page
- Bannister, 2014, ICT, public values and transformative government: A framework and programme for research, Government Information Quarterly, 31, 119, 10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Brown, 2021, Understanding public value – Why does it matter?, International Journal of Public Administration, 44, 803, 10.1080/01900692.2021.1929558 · DOI
- Cordella, 2012, A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms: A theoretical reflection, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 512, 10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Cordella, 2018, ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logic, Information Polity, 23, 125, 10.3233/IP-170061 · DOI
- De Graaf, 2016, Coping with public value conflicts, Administration and Society, 48, 1101, 10.1177/0095399714532273 · DOI
- Følstad, 2023, User interactions with a municipality chatbot—Lessons learnt from dialogue analysis, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 10.1080/10447318.2023.2238355 · DOI
- Fukumoto, 2021, Public values theory: What is missing?, The American Review of Public Administration, 49, 635, 10.1177/0275074018814244 · DOI
- Goh, 2020, IT value creation in public sector: How IT-enabled capabilities mitigate tradeoffs in public organisations, European Journal of Information Systems, 29, 25, 10.1080/0960085X.2019.1708821 · DOI
- Haugeland, 2022, Understanding the user experience of customer service chatbots: An experimental study of chatbot interaction design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 161, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102788 · DOI · Paper page
- Hilhorst, 2022, Efficiency gains in public service delivery through information technology in municipalities, Government Information Quarterly, 39, 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101724 · DOI
- Jørgensen, 2007, Public values: An inventory, Administration and Society, 39, 354, 10.1177/0095399707300703 · DOI · Paper page
- Karunasena, 2012, Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka, Government Information Quarterly, 29, 76, 10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Luo, 2021, A critical review of state-of-the-art chatbot designs and applications, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12, 1
- Makasi, 2020, Chatbot-mediated public service delivery: A public service value-based framework, First Monday, 25
- Makasi, 2022, Public service values and chatbots in the public sector: Reconciling designer efforts and user expectations, 2334, 10.24251/HICSS.2022.292 · DOI
- Makasi, 2021, A typology of chatbots in public service delivery, IEEE Software, 39, 58, 10.1109/MS.2021.3073674 · DOI
- Maragno, 2021, E-government for public values creation: A systematic literature review, 386
- Meynhardt, 2009, Public value inside: What is public value creation?, International Journal of Public Administration, 32, 192, 10.1080/01900690902732632 · DOI · Paper page
- Minelli, 2018, Citizen feedback as a tool for continuous improvement in local bodies, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31, 46, 10.1108/IJPSM-01-2017-0010 · DOI
- van Noordt, 2022, Artificial intelligence for the public sector: results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union, Government Information Quarterly, 39, 101714, 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101714 · DOI · Paper page
- O‘Flynn, 2021, Where to for public value? Taking stock and moving on, International Journal of Public Administration, 44, 867, 10.1080/01900692.2021.1884696 · DOI
- Rose, 2014, Managing e-government: Value positions and relationships, Information Systems Journal, 25, 531, 10.1111/isj.12052 · DOI
- Scupola, 2022, Co-production in digital transformation of administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark, Government Information Quarterly, 39, 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650 · DOI
- Twizeyimana, 2019, The public value of E-government: A literature review, Government Information Quarterly, 36, 167, 10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Vassilakopoulou, 2022, Developing human/AI interactions for chat-based customer services: Lessons learned from the Norwegian government, European Journal of Information Systems, 32, 10, 10.1080/0960085X.2022.2096490 · DOI
- Verne, 2022, How can I help you? A chatbot’s answers to citizens’ information needs, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 34, 233
- Zhang, 2022, Orchestrating artificial intelligence for urban sustainability, Government Information Quarterly, 39, 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101720 · DOI
- Zhang, 2023, Organizational factors affecting successful implementation of chatbots for customer service, Journal of Internet Commerce, 22, 122, 10.1080/15332861.2021.1966723 · DOI
Cited by
Exploring the Challenges of Generative AI on Public Sector Communication in Europe
Lovari, A., & De Rosa, F. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.9644 · Cited by 22
AI and the transformation of accountability and discretion in urban governance
Goldsmith, S., & Yang, J. (2026) · Urban Governance · doi:10.1016/j.ugj.2026.02.005 · Cited by 17
“Government chat-bots illustrate how conversational interfaces help citizens navigate public services and comprehend administrative processes, while also enabling agencies to detect informational gaps and improve communication ( Chen et al., 2023 ; Larsen & Følstad, 2024 ; Pislaru et al., 2024 ).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Larsen, A. G., & Følstad, A.
- Venue
- Government Information Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101927
- ISSN
- 0740-624X
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 9
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of chatbots on public service provision: A qualitative interview study with citizens and public service providers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101927
- The paper
- Larsen, A. G., & Følstad, A. (2024). The impact of chatbots on public service provision: A qualitative interview study with citizens and public service providers. Government Information Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101927
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.