Cited by 169Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentOil Palm Production and Sustainability

Exchange rates, soybean supply response, and deforestation in South America

Open access
Richards, Peter D., Myers, Robert J., Swinton, Scott M., Walker, Robert T.·2012·Global Environmental Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The economic situation marked by very high oil prices at the end of the 2000s did not stimulate crop expansion.

    “(ii) the economic situation marked by very high oil prices at the end of the 2000s did not stimulate crop expansion (Richards et al., 2012)”

    From Transition in environmental governance in the Brazilian Amazon: emergence of a new pattern of socio-economic development and deforestation (2016) · cites this paper as Richards et al., 2012

    The Introduction and background says appreciation of the Brazilian real offset rising global food prices and mitigated the effect of a late surge in soybean prices on crop-expansion incentives. Market and Exchange Effects in Brazil likewise describes late-2000s food prices, not high oil prices. The paper supports a dampened incentive for expansion, not the categorical claim that high oil prices did not stimulate it. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. ANDERSEN, L., GRANGER, C., REIS, E. J., WEINHOLD, D. & WUNDER, S. 2002. The Dynamics of Deforestation and Economic Growth in the Brazilian Amazon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  2. ANDERSON, D. P., MINERT, J. & BRESTER, G. 1989. The North American Livestock Industry: A U.S. Perspective. In: LYONS, R. M. A., KNUTSON, R. D. & MEIKE, K. (eds.) Economic Harmonization in the Canadian/U.S./Mexican Grain-Livestock Subsector. . Winnipeg, Manitoba: Texas A&M University/University of Guelph.
  3. ARCAND, J.-L., GUILLAUMONT, P. & JEANNENEY, S. 2008. Deforestation and the real exchange rate. Journal of Development Economics, 75, 242-262.
  4. ARIMA, E., RICHARDS, P. D., WALKER, R. & CALDAS, M. 2011. Statistical Confirmation of Indirect Land Use Change in the Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 6.
  5. BARNHAM, B. L. & COOMES, O. T. 1994. Reintrepeting the Amazon Rubber Boom: Investment, the State, and Dutch Disease. Latin American Research Review, 29, 73-109.
  6. BARONA, E., RAMANKUTTY, N., HYMAN, G. & COOMES, O. 2010. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, 5.
  7. CHAMBERS, R. G. 1981. Interrelationships between Monetary Instruments and Agricultural Commodity Trade. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63, 934-941.
  8. CHAMBERS, R. G. (ed.) 1988. An Overview of Exchange Rates, Macroeconomics, and Agriculture: Westview Press.
  9. CORDEN, W. M. 1984. Booming Sector and Dutch Disease Economics: Survey and Consolidation. Oxford Economic Papers, 36, 359-380.
  10. CORSETTI, G., PESENTI, P. & ROUBINI, N. 1999. What Caused the Asian Currency and financial crisis? Japan and the World Economy, 11(1999), 305-373.
  11. GRIGSBY, S. E. & ARNADE, C. A. 1986. The Effect of Exchange Rate Distortions on Grain Export Markets, The Case of Argentina. American Journal of Agricultural Economics Applied, 68, 434-440.
  12. HOOPER, P. & KOHLHAGEN, S. W. 1978. Journal of International Economics. 8, 483-511.
  13. JEPSON, W., BRANNSTROM, C. & FILIPPI, A. 2010. Regimes and Regional Land Change in the Brazilian Cerrado, 1972-2002. Annals of the Association of the American Geographers, 100, 87-111.
  14. KAIMOWITZ, D. & SMITH, J. (eds.) 2001. Soybean Technology and the Loss of Natural Vegetation in Brazil and Bolivia, New York: CABI Publishing.
  15. LAPOLA, D. M., SCHALDACHA, R., ALCAMOA, J., BONDEAUD, A., KOCHA, J., KOELKINGA, C. & PRIESSE, J. A. 2010. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
  16. NERLOVE, M. 1956. Estimates of Elasticities of Supply of Selected Agricultural Commodities. Journal of Farm Economics, 38 (2) 496-509.
  17. PFAFF, A. 1999. What Drives Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon?, : Evidence from Satellite and Socioeconomic Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 26-43.
  18. RICHARDS, P. D. 2011b. Food, Fuel, and the Hidden Margins of Capital. Journal of Land Use Science.
  19. SCHUH, E. 1974. The Exchange Rate and U. S. Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56, 1-13.
  20. SCHUH, E. 1976. The New Macroeconomics of Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58, 802-811.
  21. WALKER, R., DEFRIES, R. S., VERA-DIAZ, M. D. C., SHIMABUKURO, Y. & VENTURIERI, A. 2009b. The Expansion of Intensive Agriculture and Ranching in Brazilian Amazonia. In: KELLER, M. (ed.) Amazonia and Global Change. Washington D.C.: American Geophysical Union.
  22. WARNKEN, P. F. 1999. The Development and Growth of the Soybean Industry in Brazil, Ames, Iowa, Iowa State University Press.
  23. WUNDER, S. 2000. The Economics of Deforestation: The Example of Ecuador, New York, St. Martin's Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richards, P. D., Myers, R. J., Swinton, S. M., & Walker, R. T.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Richards, Peter D.
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
454-462
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066753732
Cited by
169
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Graduate Research Master's Degree Plan B Papers (submittedVersion)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Economic Research Service
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
soybean expansion, currency devaluation, exchange rates, deforestation, cropland expansion, soybean prices, Brazilian real, dollar depreciation, Amazon, Cerrado, Atlantic Forest, South America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review