Cited by 348Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentSoil and Land Suitability Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Estimating the world's potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.005

Cites

67 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 70 references

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. FAO, 2003, Multipurpose Landcover Database for DR Congo – AFRICOVER
  2. Miranda, S.C., Bustamante, M., Palace, M., Hagen, S., Keller, M., Ferreira, L.G. Regional variations in biomass distribution in savanna woodland in Brazil. Biotropica, in press.
  3. Young, 2000, How much spare land exists?, Bulletin of the International Union of Soil Science, 97, 51

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 348

Metadata

Authors
Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Ferreira, L., Grau, R., Mayaux, P., Meyfroidt, P., Morton, D. C., Rudel, T. K., Gasparri, I., & Munger, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
  • National University of Tucumán (AR)
  • European Commission (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Global Environmental Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
892-901
ISSN
0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967032686
Cited by
348
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 7
FWCI
23.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Environmental Change (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
  • CONICET Digital (CONICET) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Francqui Foundation and Academia Belgica
  • NSF (CNHS 0709598, 0709645)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Development › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
Keywords
cropland expansion, land conversion, bottom-up approach, ecosystem service trade-offs, rainfed agriculture, land use restrictions, underutilized land, agricultural intensification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review