Mapping the world's degraded lands
Open accessAbstract
Degraded lands have often been suggested as a solution to issues of land scarcity and as an ideal way to meet mounting global demands for agricultural goods, but their locations and conditions are not well known. Four approaches have been used to assess degraded lands at the global scale: expert opinion, satellite observation, biophysical models, and taking inventory of abandoned agricultural lands. We review prominent databases and methodologies used to estimate the area of degraded land, translate these data into a common framework for comparison, and highlight reasons for discrepancies between the numbers. Global estimates of total degraded area vary from less than 1 billion ha to over 6 billion ha, with equally wide disagreement in their spatial distribution. The risk of overestimating the availability and productive potential of these areas is severe, as it may divert attention from efforts to reduce food and agricultural waste or the demand for land-intensive commodities.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Global estimates of degraded land vary from less than 1 billion ha to over 6 billion ha and disagree widely in spatial distribution. The paper reviews four major mapping approaches and compares prominent datasets on a common grid, warning that overestimating degraded-land availability could distract from reducing waste and demand for land-intensive commodities.
Key findings
- Global degraded-area estimates range from <1 billion ha to >6 billion ha: GLASOD estimated nearly 2 billion ha (22.5%) degraded since the mid-20th century; FAO TerraSTAT found over 6 billion ha (66% of world land) affected; Dregne and Chou estimated roughly 3.6 billion ha (70%) of drylands degraded; GLADA found declining NPP across 21% of global land, 2.7 billion ha; Cai et al. estimated nearly 1 billion ha; Campbell et al. estimated 385–472 million ha of abandoned agricultural land.
- Spatial disagreement is severe: the greatest disagreement is in Asia, where only two datasets agree and standard deviation exceeds 30% of cell area across large parts of China and Southeast Asia; Central Africa shows >40% standard deviations.
- Agreement is mostly about non-degradation: of cells where all four datasets agree, 89% have average degradation less than 5% of cell area.
- Pairwise comparison shows little relationship between some methods: GLADA and GLASOD had R² = 0.00 for percent area degraded in 20 km cells, partly because GLASOD considered soil degradation over centuries while GLADA considered vegetation degradation over decades.
Methods
- The paper reviews four approaches to global degraded-land assessment: expert opinion, satellite-derived net primary productivity, biophysical models, and abandoned agricultural land mapping.
- For comparison, the authors selected one map per method (GLASOD, GLADA, Cai et al. 2011, and Campbell et al. 2008), converted them to percent area degraded on a common equal-area Eckert IV grid at 1 km, aggregated to 20 km cells, and excluded degradation labeled light in severity.
- They assessed similarities and differences using visual comparison, number of datasets in agreement, linear regression among pairs of datasets, and standard deviation among all four datasets in each 20 km cell.
Limitations
- Stated: none of the assessments provided direct measurement of degradation; all relied on proxies, and quantifying error or uncertainty is difficult or impossible because there are no accepted values for comparison.
- Stated: definitions, methodologies, time periods, and geographic domains differ across datasets; satellite approaches only capture degradation after the 1980s and mainly ongoing processes, biophysical models are limited to current croplands, and abandonment estimates exclude non-agricultural degradation and rely on uncertain historical land-use inputs.
- Evident from the paper’s methods: the comparison uses only one map per approach and excludes light-severity degradation, so the synthesis may not represent the full range or detail of each method’s estimates.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 110 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
The methods of mapping degraded lands discussed in the previous sections have led to notably different descriptions of their spatial distribution.
“The methods of mapping degraded lands discussed in the previous sections have led to notably different descriptions of their spatial distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The total area degraded and abandoned in the Cai et al. (2011) data set was 42 percent higher than the area reported by Cai et al. (2011).
“We noted that the total area degraded and abandoned in the data set was 42 percent higher than the area reported by Cai et al. (2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Any areas mapped as greater than 50 percent abandoned agriculture in Campbell et al. (2008) are smaller (6400 km2) than those areas of disagreement discussed above.
“any areas mapped as greater than 50 percent abandoned agriculture are smaller ( 6400 km 2 ) than those areas of disagreement discussed above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campbell et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The Campbell et al. (2008) data set does not appear to contribute to high standard deviations among the four sets because it does not contain large areas of concentrated abandonment.
“The Campbell et al. (2008) data set does not appear to contribute to high standard deviations among the four sets because it does not contain large areas of concentrated abandonment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campbell et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
There is very little agreement between GLADA and GLASOD when considered spatially (R2 = 0.00 for percent area degraded in 20 km cells).
“there is very little agreement between GLADA and GLASOD when considered spatially (R 2 ¼ 0.00 for percent area degraded in 20 km cells)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
In North America, the greatest disagreement is in Southern Mexico and the Upper Midwestern US.
“In North America, it is in Southern Mexico and the Upper Midwestern US.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
None of the assessments described in the paper provided direct measurement of degradation.
“None of the assessments described here provided direct measurement of degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
All studies relied on proxies in the form of satellite-derived indices, expert opinion, agricultural abandonment, or modeling.
“All studies relied on proxies in the form of satellite-derived indices, expert opinion, agricultural abandonment, or modeling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is general agreement among the data sets regarding areas with little to no degradation.
“There is general agreement among the data sets regarding areas with little to no degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
In Europe, the greatest disagreement is in Western Russia.
“In Europe, the greatest disagreement is in Western Russia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Most studies ignore the social and environmental constraints and tradeoffs associated with using such lands.
“most studies ignore the social and environmental constraints and tradeoffs associated with using such lands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Several areas in the Sahel (in Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Sudan) are mapped as degraded in GLASOD, but not captured using the other approaches.
“several areas in the Sahel (in Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Sudan) are mapped as degraded in GLA-SOD, but not captured using the other approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The Cai et al. (2011) data set observes heavy degradation in the area around Moscow, in Western Russia.
“The Cai et al. (2011) data set observes heavy degradation in the area around Moscow, in Western Russia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Of the cells that show agreement among all four data sets, 89 percent have an average extent of degradation that is less than 5 percent of the cell area.
“Of the cells that show agreement among all four data sets, 89 percent have an average extent of degradation that is less than 5 percent of the cell area.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In South America, the largest disagreement is in the Pampas of Argentina, in Uruguay, and in Southern Brazil.
“In South America, the largest disagreement is in the Pampas of Argentina, in Uruguay, and in Southern Brazil.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
There is also a large area of disagreement in Central Africa, with >40 percent standard deviations.
“There is also a large area of disagreement in Central Africa, with >40 percent standard deviations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Four approaches have been used to assess degraded lands at the global scale: expert opinion, satellite observation, biophysical models, and taking inventory of abandoned agricultural lands.
“Four approaches have been used to assess degraded lands at the global scale: expert opinion, satellite observation, biophysical models, and taking inventory of abandoned agricultural lands.”
- Also stated in: § Review of key datasets · plain
“The major approaches used to quantify degraded lands can be grouped into four broad categories: 1) expert opinion; 2) satellitederived net primary productivity; 3) biophysical models; and 4) mapping abandoned cropland.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Review of key datasets · plain
- Premisecitation
Projected population increases and rapidly growing meat consumption portend a projected doubling in global demand for agricultural commodities by 2050.
“Indeed, projected population increases and rapidly growing meat consumption portend a projected doubling in global demand for agricultural commodities by 2050 (FAO, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FAO, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Agricultural expansion into natural ecosystems leads to significant losses of ecosystem services, such as habitat for biodiversity, carbon storage, flood mitigation, and soil and watershed protection.
“Though inevitable, agricultural expansion into natural ecosystems leads to significant losses of ecosystem services, such as habitat necessary to maintain biodiversity, storage of carbon, flood mitigation, and soil and watershed protection, to cite a few (Foley et al., 2005;Gibbs et al., 2010;Lambin & Meyfroidt, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Current estimates of potential production on degraded lands are greatly hindered by missing and often unreliable information.
“Current estimates of potential production on degraded lands are greatly hindered by missing and often unreliable information (Grainger, 2009;Lewis & Kelly, 2014;Zucca, Peruta, Salvia, Sommer, & Cherlet, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Grainger, 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lewis & Kelly, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zucca, Peruta, Salvia, Sommer, & Cherlet, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Lack of understanding of the location, area, and condition of degraded land is a significant roadblock to a more reality-based strategy.
“Lack of understanding of the location, area, and condition of degraded land is a significant roadblock to a more reality-based strategy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
A major challenge for the satellite-based approach is to segregate areas of naturally low productivity or sparse vegetation from those that have been degraded by human impact.
“However, a major challenge for this approach is to segregate areas of naturally low productivity or sparse vegetation from those that have been degraded by human impact.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
While satellite-based assessments may capture recent or on-going degradation by measuring changes in productivity, they will not capture the full picture of all degraded lands.
“It is important to note that while satellite-based assessments may capture recent or on-going degradation by measuring changes in productivity, they will not capture the full picture of all degraded lands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Improved technology applied to croplands may mask the effects of degradation, making it difficult for satellite data sets to reveal them.
“Furthermore, improved technology applied to croplands may mask the effects of degradation, making it difficult for satellite data sets to reveal them.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In the study by Cai et al. (2011), early application of biophysical models to assess land degradation estimated nearly 1 billion ha of degraded and abandoned lands globally.
“In the study by Cai et al. (2011), early application of biophysical models to assess land degradation estimated nearly 1 billion ha of degraded and abandoned lands globally.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Recent work has indicated that biophysical models may be combined with observations of land use to map degradation.
“Recent work has indicated that these biophysical models may be combined with observations of land use to map degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Cai et al. (2011) results do not yield a complete picture of global land degradation.
“Thus, these results do not yield a complete picture of global land degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Satellite-based assessments depict only those lands being actively affected by the processes of degradation.
“Rather they depict only those being actively affected by the processes of degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The estimate of nearly 1 billion ha of degraded land by Cai et al. (2011) includes any areas that have high productivity yet were incorrectly assigned marginal productivity by their model.
“For example, the estimate of nearly 1 billion ha of degraded land by Cai et al. (2011) includes any areas that have high productivity yet were incorrectly assigned marginal productivity by their model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
The abandonment approach is empirically driven, as it relies on the details of agricultural census data combined with the global consistency provided by satellite mapping.
“Moreover, this approach is empirically driven, as it relies on the details of agricultural census data combined with the global consistency provided by satellite mapping.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Lands degraded long ago, such as parts of West Africa or India, will not be represented by most satellite studies.
“This means that lands degraded long ago, such as parts of West Africa or India, will not be represented by most satellite studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The 42 percent higher total area degraded and abandoned in the Cai et al. (2011) data set is because they excluded some heavily degraded areas in their report, primarily Eastern Europe and Western Russia.
“This is because they excluded some heavily degraded areas in their report, primarily Eastern Europe and Western Russia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
About one-quarter of these abandoned agricultural lands (125 million ha) were across the pan-tropics.
“This study also found that about one-quarter of these abandoned agricultural lands (125 million ha) were across the pan-tropics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campbell, Lobell, and Field (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The results of these studies are not directly comparable due to differences in geographic domains, time periods and the types of agricultural land considered.
“The results of these studies are not directly comparable due to differences in geographic domains, time periods and the types of agricultural land considered.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
No woody plantation land was abandoned.
“No woody plantation land was abandoned.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites FAO, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gibbs et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Toward the end of the last century, abandonment was limited to the eastern portion of the U.S., parts of the Amazon basin and southern South America.
“Toward the end of the last century, abandonment was limited to the eastern portion of the U.S., parts of the Amazon basin and southern South America.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramankutty and Foley (1999) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
After accounting for forest regrowth and urbanization, the total area of abandoned agricultural land ranged from 385 to 472 million ha.
“However, after accounting for forest regrowth and urbanization, the total area of abandoned agricultural land ranged from 385 to 472 million ha.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campbell, Lobell, and Field (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The omission of shifting cultivation derived from historical reconstructions of land use probably leads to underestimation of abandonment in these assessments.
“Also noteworthy is the omission of shifting cultivation derived from historical reconstructions of land use, which probably leads to underestimation of abandonment in these assessments (Meiyappan & Jain, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Meiyappan & Jain, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The FAO Landsat analysis indicated that across the tropics, 77 million ha of cropland and pasture had been abandoned either temporarily or permanently during the 1990s.
“The FAO Landsat analysis indicated that across the tropics, 77 million ha of cropland and pasture had been abandoned either temporarily or permanently during the 1990s (FAO, 2001;Gibbs et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites FAO, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gibbs et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The majority of inputs regarding pre-industrial landuse patterns are considered by experts to be uncertain on all continents.
“In particular, the majority of inputs regarding pre-industrial landuse patterns are considered by experts to be uncertain on all continents (Goldewijk & Verburg, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldewijk & Verburg, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The estimates of historical land use on which the agricultural abandonment approach is based are themselves highly uncertain.
“In addition, the estimates of historical land use on which the agricultural abandonment approach is based are themselves highly uncertain (Goldewijk & Verburg, 2013;Meiyappan & Jain, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goldewijk & Verburg, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Meiyappan & Jain, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The History Database of Global Environment 3.0 (HYDE) has also been used to assess the area of abandoned cropland.
“A second database produced using satellite and census data, the History Database of Global Environment 3.0 (HYDE), has also been used to assess the area of abandoned cropland (Goldewijk, 2001;Goldewijk, Bouwman, & Drecht, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Goldewijk, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goldewijk, Bouwman, & Drecht, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Restoring and cultivating degraded lands near forests may erode their passive protection due to the increased infrastructure development.
“restoring and cultivating degraded lands near forests may erode their passive protection due to the increased infrastructure development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It is far less common for all of the data sets to agree that an area is degraded than to concur that it is not.
“Thus, it is far less common for all of the data sets to agree that an area is degraded than to concur that it is not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Other than the cropland abandonment estimates, many of the datasets contain estimates that are likely too high.
“Other than the cropland abandonment estimates, many of the datasets contain estimates that are likely too high.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: During periods of widespread degradation covering upward of 75 percent of the world's land surface, agricultural production continued to increase.
- Interpretationreasoning
The large spreads of low concentration abandonment in Campbell et al. (2008) highlight an additional concern in applying these datasets to the estimation of biofuel production: additional infrastructure needs for production on small areas spread over much of the Earth's surface would be inhibitive, at best.
“the large spreads of low concentration abandonment in Campbell et al. (2008) highlights an additional concern in applying these datasets to the estimation of biofuel production: additional infrastructure needs for production on small areas spread over much of the Earth's surface would be inhibitive, at best.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campbell et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Some types of degradation such as soil compaction or acidification are particularly difficult to discern even at the field level, much less across larger spatial scales.
“Some types of degradation such as soil compaction or acidification are particularly difficult to discern even at the field level, much less across larger spatial scales.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Quantifying the error or uncertainty in these estimates is difficult, perhaps impossible, because there are no accepted values against which to make comparisons.
“Quantifying the error or uncertainty in these estimates is difficult, perhaps impossible, because there are no accepted values against which to make comparisons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There are no accepted values against which to compare estimates of degraded land.
- Interpretationreasoning
The extremely high estimates by GLADA, FAO TerraSTAT, and Dregne and Chou (1992) are drawn into question by the continued increase in agricultural production during periods of widespread degradation.
“it does draw into question the extremely high estimates by GLADA, FAO TerraSTAT, and Dregne and Chou (1992).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dregne and Chou (1992)
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: During periods of widespread degradation covering upward of 75 percent of the world's land surface, agricultural production continued to increase.
- Interpretationreasoning
No single estimate accurately captures all degraded lands.
“No single estimate accurately captures all degraded lands, but each does contribute to the overall discussion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
In Indonesia, very low-productivity grasslands and logged forests are both categorized as degraded despite huge differences in their current use and the environmental impacts of conversion.
“in Indonesia, very low-productivity grasslands and logged forests are both categorized as degraded despite huge differences in their current use and the environmental impacts of conversion (Edwards et al., 2011;Fairhurst & McLaughlin, 2009;Woodcock et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Scaling up to national or regional levels is clearly challenging.
“Scaling up to national or regional levels is clearly challenging”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
In these regions, it is likely that vegetation degradation has occurred in recent decades, without the associated soil degradation that the other approaches would have captured.
“In these regions, it is likely that vegetation degradation has occurred in recent decades, without the associated soil degradation that the other approaches would have captured.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Even a precise map of the physical area of degraded land would significantly overestimate its potential by neglecting its myriad social, environmental, and political constraints.
“Even a precise map of the physical area of degraded land would significantly overestimate its potential by neglecting its myriad social, environmental, and political constraints (Lambin et al., 2013;Young, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The on-site impacts of degradation can be masked by inputs or by improving land management or technology.
“the on-site impacts of degradation can be masked by inputs or by improving land management or technology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Part of the variation among the data sets is expected, due to different definitions, methodologies, time periods and domains.
“Part of the variation is expected, due to different definitions, methodologies, time periods and domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The little agreement between GLADA and GLASOD is in part because GLASOD considered soil degradation over centuries while GLADA considered only vegetation degradation over decades.
“in part because GLASOD considered soil degradation over centuries while GLADA considered only vegetation degradation over decades.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Even degraded lands do not offer a 'free ride'.
“Even degraded lands do not offer a “free ride” (Lambin et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lambin et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 60
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 47
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenGlobal estimates of total degraded area vary from less than 1 billion ha to over 6 billion ha, with equally wide disagreement in their spatial distribution.
“Global estimates of total degraded area vary from less than 1 billion ha to over 6 billion ha, with equally wide disagreement in their spatial distribution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationNo clear consensus exists as to the extent of degraded land, not only globally, but even within a particular country.
“Indeed, no clear consensus exists as to the extent of degraded land, not only globally, but even within a particular country (Bindraban et al., 2012;FAO, 2008;Lepers et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe areas affected by at least moderate degradation comprise 9 percent and 47 percent of the land surface, according to GLASOD and TerraSTAT, respectively.
“The areas affected by at least moderate degradation comprise 9 percent and 47 percent of the land surface, according to GLASOD and TerraSTAT, respectively (Table 2), highlighting the high degree of interpretability of these data sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe greatest disagreement occurs in Asia where only two data sets show agreement and standard deviation among the data sets is greater than 30 percent of cell area for large areas of China and Southeast Asia.
“The greatest disagreement occurs in Asia where only two data sets show agreement and standard deviation among the data sets is greater than 30 percent of cell area for large areas of China and Southeast Asia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThis discrepancy leads to only three data sets agreeing in these regions and standard deviations of about 30 percent of cell area.
“This discrepancy leads to only three data sets agreeing in these regions and standard deviations of about 30 percent of cell area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningGLADA alone observed degradation in several areas, leading to patches of disagreement in Eastern Argentina, Quebec and Ontario in Eastern Canada, much of Central Africa, the Northern Territory in Australia, and the Central Siberian Plateau.
“GLADA alone observed degradation in several areas, leading to patches of disagreement in Eastern Argentina, Quebec and Ontario in Eastern Canada, much of Central Africa, the Northern Territory in Australia, and the Central Siberian Plateau.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhere three data sets indicate a similar degree of degradation, but one set diverges, there are three data sets in agreement and the standard deviation reflects the degree of divergence.
“Where three data sets indicate a similar degree of degradation, but one set diverges, there are three data sets in agreement (light green in Fig. 2) and the standard deviation reflects the degree of divergence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhere all four values indicate degradation of similar extent (up to 20 percent of cell area), there are four data sets in agreement and the standard deviation is low.
“Where all four values indicate degradation of similar extent (up to 20 percent of cell area), there are four data sets in agreement (dark green in Fig. 2) and the standard deviation is low (yellow or green in Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhere all four data sets indicate different states of degradation, there is only one data set in agreement and the standard deviation is high.
“Finally, where all four data sets indicate different states of degradation, there is only one data set in agreement (red in Fig. 2), and the standard deviation is high (red in Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningWhere two data sets indicate a similar state of degradation, and the other two indicate different degrees of degradation, there are two data sets in agreement and the standard deviation reflects how far the two differing sets diverge from the two in agreement.
“Similarly, where two data sets indicate a similar state of degradation, and the other two indicate different degrees of degradation, there are two data sets in agreement (yellow in Fig. 2), and the standard deviation reflects how far the two differing sets diverge from the two in agreement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationYield increases on existing croplands will be an essential component to increased food production, but by themselves will not suffice.
“Yield increases on existing croplands will be an essential component to increased food production, but by themselves will not suffice (Godfray et al., 2010;Hubert, Rosegrant, van Boekel, & Ortiz, 2010;Ray, Mueller, West, & Foley, 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe potential of degraded lands is often estimated using highly uncertain data sets and tends to be overstated, with little attention given to the current status and use of these degraded lands.
“However, this potential is often estimated using highly uncertain data sets (Field, Campbell, & Lobell, 2008;Goldewijk & Verburg, 2013;Hoogwijk et al., 2003;Meiyappan & Jain, 2012;Nijsen, Smeets, Stehfest, & Vuuren, 2012;Ramankutty, Heller, & Rhemtulla, 2010;vanVuuren, Vliet, & Stehfest, 2009), and tends to be overstated, with little attention given to the current status and use of these degraded”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Field, Campbell, & Lobell, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Goldewijk & Verburg, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lambin et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDuring the 1980s and 1990s, more than half of newly expanding agricultural areas in the tropics came at the expense of closed forests, with an additional third from disturbed forests.
“For example, Gibbs et al. (2010) found that during the 1980s and 1990s more than half of newly expanding agricultural areas in the tropics came at the expense of closed forests, with an additional third from disturbed forests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gibbs et al. (2010) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe risk of overestimating the availability and productive potential of degraded lands is severe, as it may divert attention from efforts to reduce food and agricultural waste or the demand for land-intensive commodities.
“The risk of overestimating the availability and productive potential of these areas is severe, as it may divert attention from efforts to reduce food and agricultural waste or the demand for land-intensive commodities.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
“The risks of overestimating the availability and productive potential of these areas is severe, as it may divert attention from efforts to reduce waste or the demand for land-intensive commodities such as beef.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenStudies focus on temporal and spatial scales of degradation that differ, which leads to much confusion when interpreting the results.
“Yet studies focus on temporal and spatial scales of this process that differ, which leads to much confusion when interpreting the results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD) was the first attempt to map human-induced degradation around the world and is still used today.
“The Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD) commissioned by the United Nations Environment Program was the first attempt to map human-induced degradation around the world (Oldeman, 1994;Oldeman et al., 1990) and is still used today (e.g., Nijsen et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Oldeman, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Oldeman et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nijsen et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenLands with naturally low productivity, such as heathlands or naturally saline soils, may also be described as degraded.
“Another challenge is that lands with naturally low productivity, such as heathlands or naturally saline soils, may also be described as degraded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is disagreement between degradation data that include natural processes and those that have been induced solely through human activity, and it is often difficult to distinguish between these causes.
“In addition, there is disagreement between degradation data that include natural processes and those that have been induced solely through human activity (Weigmann, Hennenberg, & Fritsche, 2008), and it is often difficult to distinguish between these causes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weigmann, Hennenberg, & Fritsche, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDue to its dependence upon local experts, the GLASOD assessment is considered subjective and has been open to disparagement.
“Due to this dependence upon local experts, the GLASOD assessment is considered subjective and has been open to disparagement (e.g., Rey, Scoones, & Toulmin, 1998, chap. 1;Thomas, 1993).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rey, Scoones, & Toulmin, 1998, chap. 1
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Thomas, 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSolicitation of expert opinion was the first approach used to map and quantify degraded lands and maintains a leading role in assessments despite its subjective nature and inconsistencies.
“Solicitation of expert opinion was the first approach used to map and quantify degraded lands and maintains a leading role in assessments despite its subjective nature and inconsistencies (Dregne & Chou, 1992;Oldeman, 1994;Oldeman, Hakkeling, & Sombroek, 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dregne & Chou, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Oldeman, 1994
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Oldeman, Hakkeling, & Sombroek, 1990
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe GLASOD study estimated that nearly 2 billion ha (22.5 percent) of agricultural land, pasture, forest and woodland had been degraded since mid-twentieth century.
“The GLASOD study estimated that nearly 2 billion ha (22.5 percent) of agricultural land, pasture, forest and woodland had been degraded since mid-twentieth century.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Oldeman et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost seminal efforts have focused on soil degradation, while more recent efforts have investigated the broader issue of land degradation from an ecosystem approach, which encompasses both soils and vegetation.
“Finally, while most seminal efforts have focused on soil degradation (Nijsen et al., 2012;Oldeman et al., 1990), more recent efforts have investigated the broader issue of land degradation from an ecosystem approach, which encompasses both soils and vegetation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nijsen et al., 2012 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Oldeman et al., 1990
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningGLASOD estimates are uniform in the sense that they are based upon defined mapping units and carefully structured definitions, but they rely on local knowledge rather than measurements.
“The estimates are uniform in the sense that they are based upon defined mapping units and carefully structured definitions but they rely on local knowledge rather than measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGLASOD was designed to generate continental scale estimates, and the sampling procedure is not adequate to draw conclusions at the national scale.
“GLASOD was designed to generate continental scale estimates, and the sampling procedure is not adequate to draw conclusions at the national scale (Bruinsma, 2003;Scherr & Yadav, 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bruinsma, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Scherr & Yadav, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe FAO TerraSTAT interpretation of GLASOD by Bot et al. (2000) finds that over 6 billion ha, 66 percent of the world's land, has been affected by degradation, leaving roughly only a third of the world's surface in good condition.
“The FAO TerraSTAT interpretation of GLASOD by Bot et al. (2000), on the other hand, finds that over 6 billion ha, 66 percent of the world's land, has been affected by degradation, leaving roughly only a third of the world's surface in good condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bot et al. (2000)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationDregne and Chou (1992) found very extensive degradation covering roughly 3.6 billion ha (70 percent) of Earth's drylands.
“They found very extensive degradation covering roughly 3.6 billion ha (70 percent) of Earth's drylands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dregne and Chou (1992)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere are few if any routine assessments of degradation at the country level that keep track of pre-existing or changing conditions, nor is there any agreement on how to conduct such assessments.
“There are few if any routine assessments of degradation at the country level that keep track of pre-existing or changing conditions, nor is there any agreement on how to conduct such assessments (Bruinsma, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bruinsma, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMany degradation studies focus only on drylands, so their results are difficult to compare with broader studies that include temperate and humid domains.
“For example, many degradation studies focus only on drylands, so their results are difficult to compare with broader studies that include temperate and humid domains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGLASOD has been criticized for the coarse spatial resolution of mapping units and the qualitative judgments whose consistency was untested.
“Others have criticized GLASOD for the coarse spatial resolution of mapping units and the qualitative judgments whose consistency was untested.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDregne and Chou (1992) concluded that in their study region 73 percent of rangelands, 47 percent of rainfed croplands, and 30 percent of irrigated croplands were degraded.
“Indeed, they concluded that in their study region 73 percent of rangelands, 47 percent of rainfed croplands, and 30 percent of irrigated croplands were degraded.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dregne and Chou (1992)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome estimates of degradation have focused on the end condition of the land, others consider the ongoing process of degradation itself, and even the perceived risk of degradation, adding more confusion to the term.
“Indeed, while some estimates of degradation have focused on the end condition of the land, others consider the ongoing process of degradation itself (e.g., Bai, Dent, Olsson, & Schaepman, 2008;Cai, Zhang, & Wang, 2011), and even the perceived risk of degradation, adding more confusion to the term.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bai, Dent, Olsson, & Schaepman, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cai, Zhang, & Wang, 2011 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEach of the four approaches offers a glimpse into the conditions on the ground but none capture the complete picture.
“Each offers a glimpse into the conditions on the ground but none capture the complete picture (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite its limitations, GLASOD remains the only complete, globally consistent information source on land degradation and has been widely used and interpreted.
“Despite its limitations, GLASOD remains the only complete, globally consistent information source on land degradation and has been widely used and interpreted (e.g., Bot, Nachtergaele, & Young, 2000;Crosson, 1995Crosson, , 1997;;Pimentel et al., 1995;Sonneveld & Dent, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Bot, Nachtergaele, & Young, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Crosson, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Pimentel et al., 1995 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationExpert judgments will continue to play a role, regardless of improvements in other methods, because degradation will remain a subjective quality whose benchmarks vary among locations.
“Such expert judgments will continue to play a role, regardless of improvements in other methods, because degradation will remain a subjective quality whose benchmarks vary among locations (Sonneveld & Dent, 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sonneveld & Dent, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe benefit of focusing on abandoned agricultural lands is that it captures the longer time frame of the expert opinion approach but quantifies the actual conditions rather than estimating potential risk.
“The benefit of focusing on these lands is that it captures the longer time frame of the expert opinion approach but quantifies the actual conditions rather than estimating potential risk.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWessels, Van Den Bergh, and Scholes (2012) were highly critical of the Bai et al. (2008) publication of GLADA results, especially in the humid tropics where results were described as fatally flawed and misleading.
“Indeed, Wessels, Van Den Bergh, and Scholes (2012) commented on the Bai et al. (2008) publication of GLADA results, and was highly critical of their methods, especially in the humid tropics where results were described as fatally flawed and misleading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wessels, Van Den Bergh, and Scholes (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bai et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSatellite data are only available from the 1980s in most cases, so we have only a short time frame to observe changes in the land surface.
“Satellite data are only available from the 1980s in most cases, so we have only a short time frame to observe changes in the land surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEarly GLADA results reveal a declining trend in NPP across 21 percent of the global land area, 2.7 billion ha, mainly in tropical Africa, Southeast Asia, China, north central Australia, the Pampas, and swaths of the boreal forest in Siberia and North America.
“Early GLADA results reveal a declining trend in NPP across 21 percent of the global land area, 2.7 billion ha, mainly in tropical Africa, Southeast Asia, China, north central Australia, the Pampas, and swaths of the boreal forest in Siberia and North America.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenRemotely-sensed data provide a major opportunity to improve our spatial representation of the locations of degraded lands in a globally consistent manner, as well as the process of degradation.
“Remotely-sensed data provide a major opportunity to improve our spatial representation of the locations of degraded lands in a globally consistent manner, as well as the process of degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBai et al. (2008) found that nearly one-fifth of degraded land is cropland, an area equivalent to more than 20 percent of all cultivated areas.
“Bai et al. (2008) also found that nearly one-fifth of this degraded land is cropland, an area equivalent to more than 20 percent of all cultivated areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenAnother way to identify degraded lands is to look for areas that were once croplands but have since been abandoned because of decreased productivity, or due to political and economic reasons.
“Another way to identify degraded lands is to look for areas that were once croplands but have since been abandoned because of decreased productivity, or due to political and economic reasons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany land-use mapping efforts employ expert opinion successfully but are generally limited by issues of consistency and bias.
“Many land-use mapping efforts employ expert opinion successfully (e.g., Achard et al., 2002;FAO, 2000) but are generally limited by issues of consistency and bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Achard et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites FAO, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningThe Cai et al. (2011) study assesses the extent of degradation due to over-utilization of lands of marginal productivity, and focuses on capturing the process of degradation, rather than the cumulative result.
“Thus, the study assesses the extent of degradation due to over-utilization of lands of marginal productivity, and focuses on capturing the process of degradation, rather than the cumulative result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Cai et al. (2011) study focuses on lands of marginal productivity currently being cropped, so it excludes previously abandoned lands, lands that were experiencing full productivity when the data were developed, and non-agricultural degradation.
“As the Cai et al. (2011) study focuses on lands of marginal productivity currently being cropped, it excludes previously abandoned lands, lands that were experiencing full productivity when the data were developed, and non-agricultural degradation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCai et al. (2011) results asserted that Asia (China and India only) contained most of the land degradation, 490 million ha.
“Results asserted that Asia (China and India only) contained most of the land degradation, 490 million ha (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cai et al. (2011) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRoughly 23 percent of forests are improving along with more than 43 percent of rangelands.
“Roughly 23 percent of forests are also improving along with more than 43 percent of rangelands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent satellite advances have enabled new global scale datasets of agricultural land cover, which have been developed by merging satellite derived land cover maps with ground level agricultural inventory data sets.
“Recent satellite advances have enabled new global scale datasets of agricultural land cover, which have been developed by merging satellite derived land cover maps with ground level agricultural inventory data sets (Cardille, Foley, & Costa, 2002;Goldewijk, 2001;Ramankutty & Foley, 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenDeviations from normal NDVI may indicate land degradation once other factors that may be responsible, such as rainfall, climate, and land use, are taken into account.
“Deviations from normal NDVI may indicate land degradation once other factors that may be responsible, such as rainfall, climate, and land use are taken into account.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationExtensive ground data, currently unavailable, will be required to produce reliable estimates of degraded areas from remote sensing at broad scales.
“Still, extensive ground data, currently unavailable, will be required to produce reliable estimates of degraded areas from remote sensing at broad scales (Kniivila, 2004).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kniivila, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe vast majority (78 percent) of degrading lands are found in humid regions, which is contrary to the popular belief that most degradation occurs in drylands.
“The vast majority (78 percent) of degrading lands are found in humid regions, which is contrary to the popular belief that most degradation occurs in drylands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSatellite data will struggle to distinguish the fine gradients that exist between degraded and non-degraded grasslands and may be further limited by potentially confounding biophysical conditions.
“Satellite data will also struggle to distinguish the fine gradients that exist between degraded and non-degraded grasslands and may be further limited by potentially confounding biophysical conditions (e.g., seasonality in drylands and environmental trends; Wesselset al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wesselset al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe accuracy of the biophysical approach will be influenced by the quality of the data used for calibration and the suitability of the model selected, which can be especially challenging when trying to manage conditions that vary locally at the global scale.
“Thus, the accuracy of the biophysical approach will be influenced by the quality of the data used for calibration and the suitability of the model selected, which can be especially challenging when trying to manage conditions that vary locally at the global scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBai et al. (2008) found that 16 percent of global land area is increasing in NPP, with 20 percent of total cropland area on an upward swing.
“But at the same time, they also found that 16 percent of global land area is increasing in NPP, with 20 percent of total cropland area on an upward swing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al. (2008) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationIt is unlikely that remote sensing will be able to map all cases of land degradation unequivocally, but the approach does provide valuable clues and has the potential to identify hotspots of ongoing degradation.
“Thus, it is unlikely that remote sensing will be able to map all cases of land degradation unequivocally, but the approach does provide valuable clues and has the potential to identify hotspots of ongoing degradation (Alcantara, Kuemmerle, Prishchepov, & Radeloff, 2012;Prince, Becker-Reshef, & Rishmawi, 2009;Wessels, Prince, & Reshef, 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Alcantara, Kuemmerle, Prishchepov, & Radeloff, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Prince, Becker-Reshef, & Rishmawi, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wessels, Prince, & Reshef, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRoughly 40 percent of the degraded lands were found to be in forests, with another quarter in rangelands.
“Roughly 40 percent of the degraded lands were found to be in forests, with another quarter in rangelands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bai et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBiophysical modeling has been broadly used to assess the potential vegetative productivity of global land areas.
“Biophysical modeling has been broadly used to assess the potential vegetative productivity of global land areas (e.g.Fischer, van Velthuizen, Shah, & Nachtergaele, 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fischer, van Velthuizen, Shah, & Nachtergaele, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOthers posit that Dregne and Chou (1992) have greatly overestimated degradation.
“However, others posit that Dregne and Chou (1992) have greatly overestimated degradation (Helld en & Tottrup, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helld en & Tottrup, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe spatial and temporal extent, as well as the type of degradation considered, is dependent upon the input data sets for the modeling process.
“The spatial and temporal extent, as well as the type of degradation considered, is dependent upon the input data sets for the modeling process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenModeling approaches that rely on models will inevitably be influenced by any inherent error.
“Unfortunately, however, modeling approaches that rely on models will inevitably be influenced by any inherent error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe expert opinion approach will continue as a mainstay until satellite-based measurements can provide more accurate and detailed information for both vegetation and soils.
“The expert opinion approach will continue as a mainstay until satellite-based measurements can provide more accurate and detailed information for both vegetation and soils.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe vast majority of the agricultural abandonment occurred in Latin America, where over 56 million ha of land became 'idle' during the 1990s.
“The vast majority of the agricultural abandonment occurred in Latin America, where over 56 million ha of land became 'idle' during the 1990s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites FAO, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gibbs et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTropical Asia accounts for 12 million ha and Africa for the remaining 9 million ha of abandoned land.
“Tropical Asia accounts for 12 million ha and Africa for the remaining 9 million ha of abandoned land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites FAO, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gibbs et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA significant limitation of the abandonment approach is that it excludes degradation other than agricultural abandonment, so the numbers should be considered extremely conservative estimates of degradation.
“A significant limitation of this approach is that it excludes degradation other than agricultural abandonment, so the numbers should be considered extremely conservative estimates of degradation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe HYDE database also provides information on pastures not captured by Ramankutty and Foley (1999).
“The HYDE database also provides information on pastures not captured by Ramankutty and Foley (1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramankutty and Foley (1999) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe magnitude of reported changes are relatively similar, suggesting some degree of confirmation.
“However, it is important to note that the magnitude of reported changes are relatively similar, suggesting some degree of confirmation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost cropland abandonment occurred in eastern North America during the early 1900s but expanded to China, southern South America and Europe by mid-century.
“Most cropland abandonment occurred in eastern North America during the early 1900s but expanded to China, southern South America and Europe by mid-century.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramankutty and Foley (1999) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe analysis of the HYDE database by Campbell, Lobell, and Field (2009) found that over the last three centuries, 269 million ha of cropland and 479 million ha of pastureland were abandoned.
“The analysis of the HYDE database by Campbell, Lobell, and Field (2009) found that over the last three centuries, 269 million ha of cropland and 479 million ha of pastureland were abandoned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Campbell, Lobell, and Field (2009) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRamankutty and Foley (1999) found that the extent of cropland abandonment increased greatly from roughly 65 million ha in the 1950s to 225 million ha in 1990, and the rate of abandonment increased as well.
“They found that the extent of cropland abandonment increased greatly from roughly 65 million ha in the 1950s to 225 million ha in 1990, and the rate of abandonment increased as well.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ramankutty and Foley (1999) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDegradation in one area may have ripple effects on other areas that are not readily evident from observations (e.g., siltation, chemical contamination).
“Degradation in one area may have ripple effects on other areas that are not readily evident from observations (e.g., siltation, chemical contamination).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTo grow crops or animals on lands with reduced productivity will be a low profit-high cost enterprise that is unlikely to happen without strong economic incentives to farmers and agroindustry.
“To grow crops or animals on lands with reduced productivity will be a low profitehigh cost enterprise that is unlikely to happen without strong economic incentives to farmers and agroindustry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationLambin et al. (2013) emphasize that the physical availability of degraded land is only part of the story.
“Lambin et al. (2013) emphasize that the physical availability of degraded land is only part of the story.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lambin et al. (2013) source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe GAEZ data set does not indicate the cause of salinization, but it could suggest more about the improvability of the land than the more general term 'degraded.'
“Though this data set does not indicate the cause of salinization, it could yet suggest more about the improvability of the land than the more general term 'degraded.'”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe two global agricultural databases are difficult to compare because Ramankutty and Foley (1999) do not consider abandonment of pastureland, which is part of the Campbell et al. (2009) estimate.
“The two global agricultural databases are also difficult to compare because Ramankutty and Foley (1999) do not consider abandonment of pastureland, which is part of the Campbell et al. (2009) estimate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe number of data sets in agreement revealed places where the majority of data sets diverged in their appraisal of degradation effects.
“The number of data sets in agreement revealed places where the majority of data sets diverged in their appraisal of degradation effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe FAO/IIASA analysis of Global Agro-EcoZones (GAEZ) estimates that 1.39 billion ha are affected by excess salts, leading to moderate, severe, or very severe constraints.
“The FAO/IIASA analysis of Global Agro-EcoZones (GAEZ) estimates that 1.39 billion ha are affected by excess salts, leading to moderate, severe, or very severe constraints (FAO/IIASA 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites FAO/IIASA 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRestoration of degraded lands does offer a lower-carbon expansion pathway, and could provide some respite for forest conversion or increase food production in key locales.
“Restoration of degraded lands does offer a lower-carbon expansion pathway, and could provide some respite for forest conversion or increase food production in key locales (Gibbs et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gibbs et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOur uncertain knowledge of degraded lands is not surprising given the significant measurement challenges of capturing a dynamic and subjective condition.
“Our uncertain knowledge of degraded lands is not surprising given the significant measurement challenges of capturing a dynamic and subjective condition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Degradation is a dynamic and subjective condition.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEfforts to map degraded lands often aim to identify regions that could be converted to uses deemed more productive, particularly biofuel production.
“Efforts to map degraded lands often aim to identify regions that could be converted to uses deemed more productive, particularly biofuel production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSome degraded lands were once forests or savannas and may be better suited to restoration to those ecosystems, and their associated carbon sinks, rather than undergoing further development for agriculture.
“Some degraded lands were once forests or savannas and may be better suited to restoration to those ecosystems, and their associated carbon sinks, rather than undergoing further development for agriculture (Houghton & Hackler, 2006;Piñeiro, Jobb agy, Baker, Murray, & Jackson, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Houghton & Hackler, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Piñeiro, Jobb agy, Baker, Murray, & Jackson, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataStandard deviation, calculated independently for each 20 km cell, indicated the spread of the values that the four mapping methods ascribe to degraded area.
“Standard deviation, calculated independently for each 20 km cell, indicated the spread of the values that the four mapping methods ascribe to degraded area.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataLinear regression indicated the presence or absence of any relationships between specific pairs of degradation mapping methods.
“Linear regression indicated the presence or absence of any relationships between specific pairs of degradation mapping methods (e.g.expert opinion versus abandoned agriculture).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn many ways our focus on using degraded lands is a distraction; it lulls us into complacency by implying that we can easily continue meeting global demands for agricultural commodities.
“In many ways our focus on using degraded lands is a distraction; it lulls us into complacency by implying that we can easily continue meeting global demands for agricultural commodities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLeakage may occur as communities evicted from such degraded areas are pushed into the forest frontier, or they could face reduced livelihoods if pushed onto even lower quality lands.
“Leakage may also occur as communities evicted from such degraded areas are pushed into the forest frontier, or they could face reduced livelihoods if pushed onto even lower quality lands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEmphasizing and mapping these vulnerable regions may also facilitate large-scale economic land acquisitions, as countries perceived to have more cultivable land are likely to be more attractive to investment by others.
“Emphasizing and mapping these vulnerable regions may also facilitate largescale economic land acquisitions, as countries perceived to have more cultivable land are likely to be more attractive to investment by others (Deininger & Byerlee, 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Deininger & Byerlee, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenVisual comparison was useful in identifying large differences between maps at the global scale.
“Visual comparison was useful in identifying large differences between maps at the global scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe estimates provided here provide a starting point for considering the potential of degraded land.
“The estimates provided here provide a starting point for considering the potential of degraded land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationDespite uncertainties in these estimates of degraded areas and their ideal uses, improved understanding of our global land base is necessary to address worldwide land scarcity, and to develop policies around bioenergy and large-scale land acquisitions.
“Despite uncertainties in these estimates of degraded areas and their ideal uses, improved understanding of our global land base is necessary to address worldwide land scarcity, and to develop policies around bioenergy and large-scale land acquisitions (Lambin & Meyfroidt, 2011;Lambin et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThey emphasize the urgency for new approaches that will likely require a combination of innovative satellite data analysis and extensive field inventories.
“they emphasize the urgency for new approaches that will likely require a combination of innovative satellite data analysis and extensive field inventories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
Any pixel with a negative trend in RUE-adjusted NDVI is degraded over its full area.
“Following the method used by Bai et al. (2008), we assumed that any pixel with a negative trend in RUE-adjusted NDVI is degraded over its full area.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Marginal productivity is an indicator of land fragility or sensitivity to over-utilization.
“Marginal productivity is assumed to be an indicator of land fragility or sensitivity to over-utilization.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no accepted values against which to compare estimates of degraded land.
“there are no accepted values against which to make comparisons”
The paper relies on this without support.
During periods of widespread degradation covering upward of 75 percent of the world's land surface, agricultural production continued to increase.
“during these periods of widespread degradation covering upward of 75 percent of the world's land surface, we have continued to increase our agricultural production”
The paper relies on this without support.
Degradation is a dynamic and subjective condition.
“capturing a dynamic and subjective condition”
The paper relies on this without support.
Site-specific context, such as soil type, topography, farming practices and land use history, influences degradation.
“Site-specific context, such as soil type, topography, farming practices and land use history, all influence degradation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The recoverability of degraded lands is not in linear relationship with its degradation pressure.
“the recoverability of degraded lands is not in linear relationship with its degradation pressure”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a tipping point beyond which the resources needed to recover degraded land may no longer justify its improvement.
“Beyond this threshold, the resources needed to recover the land may no longer justify its improvement.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Irrigation will be needed in many degraded regions and will stress worldwide water supply.
“Irrigation will undoubtedly be needed in many degraded regions and this will stress our already tenuous worldwide water supply.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Remote sensing is scarcely used for marginal lands.
“Unfortunately, remote sensing is scarcely used for marginal lands (Gibbs and Salmon, 2015), although it would be of significant benefit if applied (Fig. 5).”
From Intensify production, transform biomass to energy and novel goods and protect soils in Europe—A vision how to mobilize marginal lands (2018) · cites this paper as Gibbs and Salmon, 2015
Cites
Global Consequences of Land Use
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., et al. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1111772 · Cited by 13,272 · see citing works
Self-citationFood Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt
Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152747 · Cited by 3,902 · see citing works
Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428 · Cited by 3,415 · see citing works
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · doi:10.4060/ca9825en · Cited by 3,408 · see citing works
Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity
Lambin, E. F., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1100480108 · Cited by 3,160 · see citing works
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revisionPreprint
Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.288998 · Cited by 3,155 · see citing works
Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M., Crist, S., Shpritz, L., Fitton, L., Saffouri, R., et al. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.267.5201.1117 · Cited by 2,861 · see citing works
Diversity and Productivity in a Long-Term Grassland Experiment
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B., Knops, J., Wedin, D., Mielke, T., & Lehman, C. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060391 · Cited by 2,373 · see citing works
Estimating historical changes in global land cover: Croplands from 1700 to 1992
Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (1999) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb900046 · Cited by 2,074 · see citing works
Determination of Deforestation Rates of the World's Humid Tropical Forests
Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H.-J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, T., & Malingreau, J.-P. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070656 · Cited by 1,993 · see citing works
Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020
(2020) · FAO eBooks · doi:10.4060/ca8753en · Cited by 1,978 · see citing works
The State of Food and Agriculture 2020
(2020) · FAO eBooks · doi:10.4060/cb1447en · Cited by 1,908 · see citing works
Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s
Gibbs, H. K., Ruesch, A. S., Achard, F., Clayton, M. K., Holmgren, P., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0910275107 · Cited by 1,876 · see citing works
Self-citationCarbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass
Tilman, D., Hill, J., & Lehman, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133306 · Cited by 1,813 · see citing works
(2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279 · see citing works
Rising global interest in farmland: can it yield sustainable and equitable benefits?
Byerlee, D., Deininger, K., Lindsay, J., Norton, A., Selod, H., & Selod, H. (2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-0396 · Cited by 1,205 · see citing works
Proxy global assessment of land degradation
Bai, Z. G., Dent, D. L., Olsson, L., & Schaepman, M. E. (2008) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00169.x · Cited by 987 · see citing works
Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: the HYDE database
Goldewijk, K. K. (2001) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/1999gb001232 · Cited by 984 · see citing works
Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands
Wright, C. K., & Wimberly, M. C. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1215404110 · Cited by 860 · see citing works
Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource
Field, C. B., CAMPBELL, J., & Lobell, D. B. (2008) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.12.001 · Cited by 814 · see citing works
World map of the status of human-induced soil degradation: an explanatory note.
Oldeman, L. R., Hakkeling, R. T. A., & Sombroek, W. G. (1990) · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
Gelfand, I., Sahajpal, R., Zhang, X., Izaurralde, R. C., Gross, K. L., & Robertson, G. P. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11811 · Cited by 736 · see citing works
Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy
Hoogwijk, M. M., Faaij, A. P. C., van den Broek, R., Berndes, G., Gielen, D. J., & Turkenburg, W. C. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(02)00191-5 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands
Campbell, J. E., Lobell, D. B., Genova, R. C., & Field, C. B. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es800052w · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Global Agro-ecological Assessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century: Methodology and Results
Fischer, G., van Velthuizen, H. T., Shah, M. M., & Nachtergaele, F. (2002) · IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Global Extent of Soil Degradation
Oldeman, L. R. (1992) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 493 · see citing works
A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981–2000
LEPERS, E., LAMBIN, E. F., JANETOS, A. C., DeFRIES, R., ACHARD, F., RAMANKUTTY, N., & SCHOLES, R. J. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0115:asoior]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 478 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, no clear consensus exists as to the extent of degraded land, not only globally, but even within a particular country (Bindraban et al., 2012; FAO, 2008; Lepers et al., 2005).”
BackgroundGibbs, H. K., Johnston, M., Foley, J. A., Holloway, T., Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., & Zaks, D. (2008) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034001 · Cited by 470 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The FAO Landsat analysis indicated that across the tropics, 77 million ha of cropland and pasture had been abandoned either temporarily or permanently during the 1990s (FAO, 2001; Gibbs et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLand Availability for Biofuel Production
Cai, X., Zhang, X., & Wang, D. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es103338e · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Robertson, G. P., Dale, V. H., Doering, O. C., Hamburg, S. P., Melillo, J. M., Wander, M. M., Parton, W. J., Adler, P. R., Barney, J. N., Cruse, R. M., et al. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1161525 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Self-citationEdwards, D. P., Larsen, T. H., Docherty, T. D. S., Ansell, F. A., Hsu, W. W., Derhé, M. A., Hamer, K. C., & Wilcove, D. S. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1062 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Estimating the world's potentially available cropland using a bottom-up approach
Lambin, E. F., Gibbs, H. K., Ferreira, L., Grau, R., Mayaux, P., Meyfroidt, P., Morton, D. C., Rudel, T. K., Gasparri, I., & Munger, J. (2013) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.005 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping abandoned agriculture with multi-temporal MODIS satellite data
Alcántara, C., Kuemmerle, T., Prishchepov, A. V., & Radeloff, V. C. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.019 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Regional desertification: A global synthesis
Helldén, U., & Tøttrup, C. (2008) · Global and Planetary Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2008.10.006 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Limits to detectability of land degradation by trend analysis of vegetation index data
Wessels, K., van den Bergh, F., & Scholes, R. J. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.022 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Reij, C., Scoones, I., & Toulmin, C. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315070858 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Land resource potential and constraints at regional and country levels
Bot, A. J., Nachtergaele, F., & Young, A. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Assessing the impact of soil degradation on food production
Bindraban, P. S., van der Velde, M., Ye, L., van den Berg, M., Materechera, S., Kiba, D. I., Tamene, L., Ragnarsdóttir, K. V., Jongschaap, R., Hoogmoed, M., et al. (2012) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.015 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Greater Transportation Energy and GHG Offsets from Bioelectricity Than Ethanol
Campbell, J. E., Lobell, D. B., & Field, C. B. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1168885 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Scherr, S. J., & Yadav, S. N. (1996) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.42280 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
The Future of Food: Scenarios for 2050
Hubert, B., Rosegrant, M. W., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., & Ortiz, R. O. (2010) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2009.09.0530 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Meiyappan, P., & Jain, A. K. (2012) · Frontiers of Earth Science · doi:10.1007/s11707-012-0314-2 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Holm, A. M. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/s0034-4257(02)00199-2 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Young, A. (1999) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1023/a:1010055012699 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Prince, S. D., Becker‐Reshef, I., & Rishmawi, K. (2009) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.016 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Future bio-energy potential under various natural constraints
van Vuuren, D. P., van Vliet, J., & Stehfest, E. (2009) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.05.029 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Biofuels: prospects risks and opportunities
(2008) · The state of food and agriculture · doi:10.18356/75039ff9-en · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Prevailing Myths About Agricultural Abandonment and Forest Regrowth in the United States
Ramankutty, N., Heller, E., & Rhemtulla, J. M. (2010) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045601003788876 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Sustaining the Soil: Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation in Africa
Carter, R. (1997) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/s0306-9192(98)00013-x · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Wessels, K., Prince, S. D., & Becker‐Reshef, I. (2008) · Journal of Arid Environments · doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008.05.011 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
An evaluation of the global potential of bioenergy production on degraded lands
Nijsen, M., Smeets, E., Stehfest, E., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01121.x · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Mapping contemporary global cropland and grassland distributions on a 5 × 5 minute resolution
Goldewijk, K. K., Drecht, G. V., & Bouwman, L. (2007) · Journal of Land Use Science · doi:10.1080/17474230701622940 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Goldewijk, K. K., & Verburg, P. H. (2013) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9877-x · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Sonneveld, B. G. J. S., & Dent, D. (2007) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.008 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Emissions of carbon from land use change in sub‐Saharan Africa
Houghton, R. A., & Hackler, J. L. (2006) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2005jg000076 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Set‐asides can be better climate investment than corn ethanol
Piñeiro, G., Jobbagy, E. G., Baker, J. S., Murray, B. C., & Jackson, R. B. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0645.1 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Lewis, S. M., & Kelly, M. (2014) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi3020430 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Will EROSION Threaten AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY?
Crosson, P. R. (1997) · Environment Science and Policy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1080/00139159709604756 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
The conservation value of South East Asia's highly degraded forests: evidence from leaf-litter ants
Woodcock, P., Edwards, D. P., Fayle, T. M., Newton, R. J., Khen, C. V., Bottrell, S. H., & Hamer, K. C. (2011) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0031 · Cited by 74 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, in Indonesia, very low-productivity grasslands and logged forests are both categorized as degraded despite huge differences in their current use and the environmental impacts of conversion (Edwards et al., 2011; Fairhurst & McLaughlin, 2009; Woodcock et al., 2011).”
BackgroundIslam, N. (1995) · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Higher US crop prices trigger little area expansion so marginal land for biofuel crops is limited
Swinton, S. M., Babcock, B. A., James, L. K., & Bandaru, V. (2011) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.05.039 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Sandstorm in a teacup? Understanding desertification
Thomas, D. S. G. (1993) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/3451281 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Grainger, A. (2009) · Land Degradation & Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.898 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Wash and Spin Cycle Threats to Tropical Biodiversity
Koh, L. P., Ghazoul, J., Butler, R. A., Laurance, W. F., Sodhi, N. S., Mateo‐Vega, J., & Bradshaw, C. J. A. (2009) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00588.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Effects of climate variability and disturbances on the Amazonian terrestrial ecosystems dynamics
Botta, A., & Foley, J. A. (2002) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001338 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Zucca, C., Peruta, R. D., Salvia, R., Sommer, S., & Cherlet, M. (2011) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.012 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cardille, J. A., Foley, J. A., & Costa, M. H. (2002) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2000gb001386 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Trading forests for yields in the Peruvian Amazon
Gibbs, H. (2012) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/011007 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationSustaining the Soil: Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation in Africa
Stocking, M., Reij, C., Scoones, I., & Toulmin, C. (1998) · Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/3060384 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gallagher, P. W. (2009) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dregne, 1992, Global desertification dimensions and costs, Degradation & Restoration of Arid Lands, 73
- Wiegmann, K., Hennenberg, K. J., Fritsche, U. R. (2008). Degraded land and sustainable bioenergy feedstock production. Paper presented at the joint international workshop on high natural value criteria and potential for sustainable use of degraded Lands, Paris.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Combatting global grassland degradation
Bardgett, R. D., Bullock, J. M., Lavorel, S., Manning, P., Schaffner, U., Ostle, N., Chomel, M., Durigan, G., Fry, E. L., Johnson, D., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-021-00207-2 · Cited by 1,499 · see citing works
Soil Degradation, Land Scarcity and Food Security: Reviewing a Complex Challenge
Gomiero, T. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8030281 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy
Amelung, W., Bossio, D., VRIES, W. D., Kögel‐Knabner, I., Lehmann, J. C., Amundson, R., Bol, R., Collins, C. D., Lal, R., Leifeld, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands
Coban, O., Deyn, G. B. D., & van der Ploeg, M. J. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abe0725 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Regenerative Agriculture: An agronomic perspective
Giller, K. E., Hijbeek, R., Andersson, J. A., & Sumberg, J. (2021) · Outlook on Agriculture · doi:10.1177/0030727021998063 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Anthropogenic climate change has driven over 5 million km2 of drylands towards desertification
Burrell, A. L., Evans, J. P., & Kauwe, M. G. D. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17710-7 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Ten facts about land systems for sustainability
Meyfroidt, P., de Bremond, A., Ryan, C. M., Archer, E. R. M., Aspinall, R., Chhabra, A., Câmara, G., Corbera, E., DeFries, R., Díaz, S. M., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109217118 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Smith, P., Calvin, K., Nkem, J., Campbell, D., Cherubini, F., Grassi, G., Korotkov, V., Le Hoang, A., Lwasa, S., McElwee, P., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14878 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Arable lands under the pressure of multiple land degradation processes. A global perspective
Prăvălie, R., Patriche, C. V., Borrelli, P., Panagos, P., Roșca, B., Dumitrașcu, M., Niță, I.-A., Săvulescu, I., Birsan, M., & Bandoc, G. (2021) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
The ecological economics of land degradation: Impacts on ecosystem service values
Sutton, P. C., Anderson, S., Costanza, R., & Ida Kubiszewski, A. (2016) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.016 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Exploring the multiple land degradation pathways across the planet
Prăvălie, R. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103689 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Dong, L., Tong, X., Xi-bing, L., Zhou, J., Wang, S., & Liu, B. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.291 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Agricultural Land Degradation: Processes and Problems Undermining Future Food Security
Hossain, A., Krupnik, T. J., Timsina, J., Mahboob, M. G., Chaki, A. K., Farooq, M., Bhatt, R., Fahad, S., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49732-3_2 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Multiple cropping systems of the world and the potential for increasing cropping intensity
Waha, K., Dietrich, J. P., Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., Thornton, P. K., Bondeau, A., & Herrero, M. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102131 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Seifollahi‐Aghmiuni, S., Kalantari, Z., Egidi, G., Gaburova, L., & Salvati, L. (2022) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-022-01701-7 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Low-carbon agriculture in South America to mitigate global climate change and advance food security
Sá, J. C. D. M., Lal, R., Cerri, C. C., Lorenz, K. E., Hungría, M., & Carvalho, P. C. D. F. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2016.10.020 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity
Breed, M. F., Harrison, P. A., Blyth, C., Byrne, M. M., Gaget, V., Gellie, N. J. C., Groom, S. V. C., Hodgson, R. J., Mills, J. G., Prowse, T. A. A., et al. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0152-0 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Climate change, drought, land degradation and migration: exploring the linkages
Hermans, K., & McLeman, R. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.013 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Altered activities of extracellular soil enzymes by the interacting global environmental changes
Zuccarini, P., Sardans, J., Asensio, L., & Peñuelas, J. (2023) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.16604 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Put more carbon in soils to meet Paris climate pledges
Rumpel, C., Amiraslani, F., Koutika, L., Smith, P., Whitehead, D. C., & Wollenberg, E. K. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07587-4 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
The challenges and prospects of Ethiopian agriculture
Wendimu, G. Y. (2021) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2021.1923619 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Bustamante, M., Silva, J. S., Scariot, A. O., Sampaio, A. B., Vieira, D. L. M., Garcia, É., Sano, E. E., Fernandes, G. W., Durigan, G., Roitman, I., et al. (2019) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-018-9837-5 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Lorenz, K. E., Lal, R., & Ehlers, K. (2019) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.3270 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Camarretta, N., Harrison, P. A., Bailey, T. G., Potts, B. M., Lucieer, A., Davidson, N. J., & Hunt, M. (2019) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-019-09754-5 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
A proactive model in sustainable food supply chain: Insight from a case study
Sgarbossa, F., & Russo, I. (2016) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.022 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Soil Biodiversity Integrates Solutions for a Sustainable Future
Bach, E. M., Ramirez, K. S., Fraser, T. D., & Wall, D. H. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12072662 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Babin, A., Vaneeckhaute, C., & Iliuta, M. C. (2021) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2021.105968 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Role of biochar toward carbon neutrality
Wang, L., Deng, J., Yang, X., Hou, R., & Hou, D. (2023) · Carbon Research · doi:10.1007/s44246-023-00035-7 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Luo, S., Png, G. K., Ostle, N., Zhou, H., Hou, X., Luo, C., Quinton, J. N., Schaffner, U., Sweeney, C. J., Wang, D., et al. (2022) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108865 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Change, I. P. O. C. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157988.007 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Riggio, J., BAILLIE, J. E. M., Brumby, S. P., Ellis, E. C., Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Tait, A. M., Tepe, T. L., Theobald, D. M., Venter, O., et al. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15109 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Soil Health and Its Improvement Through Novel Agronomic and Innovative Approaches
Shahane, A. A., & Shivay, Y. S. (2021) · Frontiers in Agronomy · doi:10.3389/fagro.2021.680456 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Giuliani, G., Mazzetti, P., Santoro, M., Nativi, S., van Bemmelen, J., Colangeli, G., & Lehmann, A. (2020) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2020.102068 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Growing Dedicated Energy Crops on Marginal Lands and Ecosystem Services
Blanco-Canqui, H. (2016) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2016.03.0080 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Harden, J. W., Hugelius, G., Ahlström, A., Blankinship, J. C., Bond‐Lamberty, B., Lawrence, C. R., Loisel, J., Malhotra, A., Jackson, R. B., Ogle, S. M., et al. (2017) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13896 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
da Cunha, E. R., Santos, C. A. G., da Silva, R. M., Bacani, V. M., & Pott, A. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105141 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Gang, C., Zhao, W., Zhao, T., Zhang, Y., Gao, X., & Wen, Z. (2018) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.161 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Mine land rehabilitation: Modern ecological approaches for more sustainable mining
Gastauer, M., Silva, J. R., Caldeira, C. F., Ramos, S. J., Filho, P. W. M. E. S., Neto, A. E. F., & Siqueira, J. O. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.223 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Mao, D., Wang, Z., Wu, B., Zeng, Y., Luo, L., & Zhang, B. (2018) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.3135 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Schröder, P., Beckers, B., Daniels, S., Gnädinger, F., Maestri, E., Marmiroli, N., Mench, M., Millan, R., Obermeier, M. M., Oustriere, N., et al. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.209 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Bioenergy for climate change mitigation: Scale and sustainability
Calvin, K., Cowie, A., Berndes, G., Arneth, A., Cherubini, F., Portugal‐Pereira, J., Grassi, G., House, J. I., Johnson, F. X., Popp, A., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12863 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development
Dooley, K., & Kartha, S. (2017) · International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10784-017-9382-9 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
González‐Roglich, M., Zvoleff, A., Noon, M. L., Liniger, H., Fleiner, R., Harari, N., & García, C. L. (2018) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.019 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Mosier, S. L., Córdova, S. C., & Robertson, G. P. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems · doi:10.3389/fsufs.2021.706142 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The role of hedgerows in soil functioning within agricultural landscapes
Holden, J., Grayson, R. P., Berdeni, D., Bird, S., Chapman, P. J., Edmondson, J. L., Firbank, L. G., Helgason, T., Hodson, M. E., Hunt, S. F. P., et al. (2019) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.11.027 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Mugiyo, H., Chimonyo, V. G. P., Sibanda, M., Kunz, R. P., Masemola, C. R., Modi, A. T., & Mabhaudhi, T. (2021) · Land · doi:10.3390/land10020125 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Restoring Abandoned Farmland to Mitigate Climate Change on a Full Earth
Yang, Y., Hobbie, S. E., Hernandez, R. R., Fargione, J., Grodsky, S. M., Tilman, D., Zhu, Y.-G., Luo, Y., Smith, T. M., Jungers, J. M., et al. (2020) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.019 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Pereira, O., Ferreira, L. G., Pinto, F., & Baumgarten, L. (2018) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs10111761 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Meeting global land restoration and protection targets: What would the world look like in 2050?
Wolff, S., Schrammeijer, E. A., Schulp, C. J. E., & Verburg, P. H. (2018) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.002 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Fenta, A. A., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Tsubo, M., Yasuda, H., Shimizu, K., Kawai, T., Ebabu, K., Berihun, M. L., Sultan, D., et al. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101154 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Degraded pastures in Brazil: improving livestock production and forest restoration
Feltran-Barbieri, R., & Féres, J. G. (2021) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.201854 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Hervé‐Fernández, P., Oyarzún, C., Brumbt, C., Huygens, D., Bodé, S., Verhoest, N. E. C., & Boeckx, P. (2016) · Hydrological Processes · doi:10.1002/hyp.10984 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Peña-Arancibia, J. L., Bruijnzeel, L. A., Mulligan, M. P., & van Dijk, A. I. J. M. (2019) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.04.064 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The role of soil in the contribution of food and feed
Silver, W. L., Pérez, T., Mayer, A. C., & Jones, A. R. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0181 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The Climate Change Crisis: A Review of Its Causes and Possible Responses
Gabric, A. J. (2023) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos14071081 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Long-term soil organic carbon dynamics in temperate cropland-grassland systems
Guillaume, T., Bragazza, L., Levasseur, C., Libohova, Z., & Sinaj, S. (2020) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107184 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Fan, Y., Gan, L., Hong, C., Jessup, L. H., Jin, X., Pijanowski, B. C., Sun, Y., & Lv, L. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145022 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Meena, R. S., Pradhan, G., Singh, K., Kumar, S., Singh, A. K., Ks, S., Mina, K. K., & Srinivasarao, C. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172661 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Xie, Z., Phinn, S., Game, E. T., Pannell, D. J., Hobbs, R. J., Briggs, P., & McDonald‐Madden, E. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111317 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Using markets to leverage investment in forest and landscape restoration in the tropics
Brancalion, P. H. S., Lamb, D., Ceccon, E., Boucher, D., Herbohn, J., Strassburg, B. B. N., & Edwards, D. P. (2017) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.08.009 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
High-throughput eDNA monitoring of fungi to track functional recovery in ecological restoration
Yan, D., Mills, J. G., Gellie, N. J. C., Bissett, A. B., Lowe, A. J., & Breed, M. F. (2017) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.035 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Ebabu, K., Tsunekawa, A., Haregeweyn, N., Tsubo, M., Adgo, E., Fenta, A. A., Meshesha, D. T., Berihun, M. L., Sultan, D., Vanmaercke, M., et al. (2022) · International Soil and Water Conservation Research · doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.12.002 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production
Khanna, M., Chen, L., Basso, B., Cai, X., Field, J. L., Guan, K., Jiang, C., Lark, T. J., Richard, T. L., Spawn‐Lee, S. A., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12877 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Ramakrishna, W., Rathore, P., Kumari, R., & Yadav, R. (2019) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135062 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Current soil erosion assessment in the Loess Plateau of China: A mini-review
Wen, X., & Deng, X. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123091 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Soto, R. L., Martínez‐Mena, M., Padilla, M. C., & de Vente, J. (2020) · Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.107191 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Tekken, V., Spangenberg, J. H., Burkhard, B., Escalada, M. M., Stoll‐Kleemann, S., Trường, Đ. T., & Settele, J. (2017) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.04.010 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Chen, A., Xu, C., Zhang, M., Guo, J.-Y., Xing, X., Yang, D., Xu, B., & Yang, X. (2024) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114024 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Sustainable intensification of high-diversity biomass production for optimal biofuel benefits
Yang, Y., Tilman, D. G., Lehman, C. L., & Trost, J. J. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0166-1 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Prăvălie, R., Patriche, C. V., & Bandoc, G. (2017) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.07.006 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Production, restoration, mitigation: a new generation of plantations
Silva, L. N., Freer‐Smith, P., & Madsen, P. (2018) · New Forests · doi:10.1007/s11056-018-9644-6 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Andrés Etter, R., Andrade, Á., Nelson, C. R., Cortés, J., & Saavedra-Ramírez, K. A. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104874 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Mondal, P., McDermid, S., & Qadir, A. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111592 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Satellites reveal a small positive yield effect from conservation tillage across the US Corn Belt
Deines, J. M., Wang, S., & Lobell, D. B. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab503b · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Lindenmayer, D. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.00050 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Schillaci, C., Jones, A., Vieira, D. C. S., Munafò, M., & Montanarella, L. (2022) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.4457 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Improving food security in China by taking advantage of marginal and degraded lands
Zhang, J., He, C., Chen, L., & Cao, S. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.110 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Effect of co-application of wood vinegar and biochar on seed germination and seedling growth
Luo, X., Wang, Z., Meki, K., Xiao, W., Liu, B., Zheng, H., You, X., & Li, F. (2019) · Journal of Soils and Sediments · doi:10.1007/s11368-019-02365-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Land allocation to meet sectoral goals in Indonesia—An analysis of policy coherence
Harahap, F., Silveira, S., & Khatiwada, D. (2016) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.033 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Peddle, S. D., Hodgson, R. J., Borrett, R. J., Brachmann, S., Davies, T. C., Erickson, T. E., Liddicoat, C., Muñoz‐Rojas, M., Robinson, J. M., Watson, C. D., et al. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13124 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Fujisaki, K., Chapuis‐Lardy, L., Albrecht, A., Razafimbelo, T., Chotte, J., & Chevallier, T. (2017) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.010 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Riva, M. J., Daliakopoulos, I. Ν., Eckert, S., Hodel, E., & Liniger, H. (2017) · Applied Geography · doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.06.017 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Mahala, A. (2018) · Arabian Journal of Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3703-3 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Tuomisto, H. L., Scheelbeek, P., Chalabi, Z., Green, R., Smith, R., Haines, A., & Dangour, A. D. (2017) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.11190.2 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Anthocyanins of Coloured Wheat Genotypes in Specific Response to SalStress
Mbarki, S., Sytar, O., Živčák, M., Abdelly, C., Cerdà, A., & Brestic, M. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23071518 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Restoration of Degraded Soil for Sustainable Agriculture
Ayub, M. A., Usman, M., Faiz, T., Umair, M. U., Anwar‐ul‐Haq, M., Rizwan, M., Ali, S., & Zia‐ur‐Rehman, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-8570-4_2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Prăvălie, R., Patriche, C. V., Săvulescu, I., SÎRODOEV, I. G., Bandoc, G., & Sfîcă, L. (2019) · CATENA · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104407 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Bossolani, J. W., Crusciol, C. A. C., Leite, M. F. A., Merloti, L. F., Moretti, L. G., Pascoaloto, I. M., & Kuramae, E. E. (2021) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108188 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Wu, W., Hasegawa, T., Ohashi, H., Hanasaki, N., Liu, J., Matsui, T., Fujimori, S., Masui, T., & Takahashi, K. (2019) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12614 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Biochar supply‐chain and challenges to commercialization
Zilberman, D., Laird, D. A., Rainey, C., Jie, S., & Kahn, G. (2022) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12952 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Mbaabu, P. R., Olago, D. O., Gichaba, M., Eckert, S., Eschen, R., ORIASO, S. O., Choge, S. K., Linders, T. E. W., & Schaffner, U. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77126-7 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Realising the circular bioeconomy
Philp, J. C., & Winickoff, D. E. (2018) · OECD science, technology and industry policy papers · doi:10.1787/31bb2345-en · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Land degradation and metropolitan expansion in a peri-urban environment
Imbrenda, V., Quaranta, G., Salvia, R., Egidi, G., Salvati, L., Prokopová, M., Coluzzi, R., & Lanfredi, M. (2021) · Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk · doi:10.1080/19475705.2021.1951363 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
do Valle, R. F., Siqueira, H. E., Valera, C. A., Oliveira, C. F., Fernandes, L. F. S., Moura, J. P., & Pacheco, F. A. L. (2019) · Remote Sensing Applications Society and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rsase.2019.02.001 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Change, I. P. O. C. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157988.008 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Meena, R. S., Pradhan, G., Nalani, Kumar, S., Singh, A. K., Verma, S. K., Mina, K. K., Kumar, S., & Chaturvedi, R. (2024) · Land Degradation and Development · doi:10.1002/ldr.5224 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?
Searchinger, T. D., Beringer, T., & Strong, A. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.016 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Billah, M. M., Rahman, M. M., Abedin, J., & Akter, H. (2021) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-021-04625-1 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Change, I. P. O. C. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009157988.006 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Ahmed, A., Kuusaana, E. D., & Gasparatos, A. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.033 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gibbs, H. K., & Salmon, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gibbs, H.K.
- ORCID
- Gibbs, H.K.
- Venue
- Applied Geography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 12-21
- ISSN
- 0143-6228 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2046206266
- Semantic Scholar
- ef4853b066f9a7056d3e19b2e813a87b26dda204
- Cited by
- 753
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Applied Geography (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- degraded land, land scarcity, agricultural land demand, satellite remote sensing, biophysical model, abandoned farmland
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review