The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response
Open accessAbstract
The need to adapt to climate change is now widely recognised as evidence of its impacts on social and natural systems grows and greenhouse gas emissions continue unabated. Yet efforts to adapt to climate change, as reported in the literature over the last decade and in selected case studies, have not led to substantial rates of implementation of adaptation actions despite substantial investments in adaptation science. Moreover, implemented actions have been mostly incremental and focused on proximate causes; there are far fewer reports of more systemic or transformative actions. We found that the nature and effectiveness of responses was strongly influenced by framing. Recent decision-oriented approaches that aim to overcome this situation are framed within a “pathways” metaphor to emphasise the need for robust decision making within adaptive processes in the face of uncertainty and inter-temporal complexity. However, to date, such “adaptation pathways” approaches have mostly focused on contexts with clearly identified decision-makers and unambiguous goals; as a result, they generally assume prevailing governance regimes are conducive for adaptation and hence constrain responses to proximate causes of vulnerability. In this paper, we explore a broader conceptualisation of “adaptation pathways” that draws on ‘pathways thinking’ in the sustainable development domain to consider the implications of path dependency, interactions between adaptation plans, vested interests and global change, and situations where values, interests, or institutions constrain societal responses to change. This re-conceptualisation of adaptation pathways aims to inform decision makers about integrating incremental actions on proximate causes with the transformative aspects of societal change. Case studies illustrate what this might entail. The paper ends with a call for further exploration of theory, methods and procedures to operationalise this broader conceptualisation of adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“Problems in these contexts are ‘tame’ problems and are well-suited to the rationalist reductionist approach to decision making (Rittel and Webber, 1973; Stirling and Scoones, 2009).”
BackgroundTypology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics
Pielke, Jr. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818110 · Cited by 2,020
How science makes environmental controversies worse
Sarewitz, D. (2004) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,194
Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation
O’Brien, K. (2012) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132511425767 · Cited by 1,079
Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity
Marshall, N. A., Park, S. E., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., & Howden, S. M. (2012) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034022 · Cited by 305
Self-citationHuntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R., & Kranz, N. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015 · Cited by 290
Cited by
Folke, C. (2016) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09088-210444 · Cited by 982
Maier, H. R., Guillaume, J. H. A., van Delden, H., Riddell, G. A., Haasnoot, M., & Kwakkel, J. H. (2016) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.03.014 · Cited by 490
Addressing the risk of maladaptation to climate change
Magnan, A. K., Schipper, E. L. F., Burkett, M., Bharwani, S., Burton, I., Eriksen, S., Gemenne, F., Schaar, J., & Ziervogel, G. (2016) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.409 · Cited by 441
What makes climate change adaptation effective? A systematic review of the literature
Owen, G. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102071 · Cited by 412
Sustainability Science: Toward a Synthesis
Clark, W. C., & Harley, A. G. (2020) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012420-043621 · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Stafford Smith, M., Park, S. E., Eakin, H. C., Archer Van Garderen, E. R. M., & Campbell, B.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 325-336
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2033471958
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 65.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
- The paper
- Wise, R. M., Fazey, I., Stafford Smith, M., Park, S. E., Eakin, H. C., Archer Van Garderen, E. R. M., & Campbell, B. (2014). Reconceptualising adaptation to climate change as part of pathways of change and response. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.