The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks
Open accessAbstract
This article proposes an innovative theoretical framework that combines institutional and policy network approaches to study multi-level governance. The framework is used to derive a number of propositions on how cross-level power imbalances shape communication and collaboration across multiple levels of governance. The framework is then applied to examine the nature of cross-level interactions in climate change mitigation and adaptation policy processes in the land use sectors of Brazil and Indonesia. The paper identifies major barriers to cross-level communication and collaboration between national and sub-national levels. These are due to power imbalances across governance levels that reflect broader institutional differences between federal and decentralized systems of government. In addition, powerful communities operating predominantly at the national level hamper cross-level interactions. The analysis also reveals that engagement of national level actors is more extensive in the mitigation and that of local actors in the adaptation policy domain, and specialisation in one of the climate change responses at the national level hampers effective climate policy integration in the land use sector.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 · Cited by 21,424
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062 · cited 2×
“We used the measure of normalized betweenness, which compares actual betweenness to the maximum possible betweenness (Freeman, 1976; Scott, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodCommunity structure in social and biological networks
Girvan, M., & Newman, M. E. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.122653799 · Cited by 15,502
Change, I. P. O. C. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415416 · Cited by 4,693
Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) · ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) · Cited by 3,816
Successful adaptation to climate change across scales
Neil Adger, W., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005 · Cited by 3,128
Scale and Cross-Scale Dynamics: Governance and Information in a Multilevel World
Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P., Pritchard, L., & Young, O. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01759-110208 · Cited by 2,254
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 · Cited by 2,254
The choice for Europe: social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-5326 · Cited by 2,145
Cited by
Community forest governance and synergies among carbon, biodiversity and livelihoods
Fischer, H. W., Chhatre, A., Duddu, A., Pradhan, N., & Agrawal, A. (2023) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-023-01863-6 · Cited by 105
Climate change policies and agendas: Facing implementation challenges and guiding responses
Alves, F., Leal Filho, W., Casaleiro, P., Nagy, G. J., Diaz, H., Al-Amin, A. Q., de Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O., Hurlbert, M., Farooq, H., Klavins, M., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2019.12.001 · Cited by 83
Brown, M. A., Beasley, B., Atalay, F., Cobb, K. M., Dwiveldi, P., Hubbs, J., Iwaniek, D. M., Mani, S., Matisoff, D., Mohan, J. E., et al. (2021) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-020-01406-1 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., May, P. H., Brockhaus, M., Sari, I. M., & Kusumadewi, S. D.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 64-77
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2903530479
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 127
- FWCI
- 16.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
- The paper
- Di Gregorio, M., Fatorelli, L., Paavola, J., Locatelli, B., Pramova, E., Nurrochmat, D. R., May, P. H., Brockhaus, M., Sari, I. M., & Kusumadewi, S. D. (2019). Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
