The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The decarbonisation divide: Contextualizing landscapes of low-carbon exploitation and toxicity in Africa
Open accessAbstract
Much academic research on low-carbon transitions focuses on the diffusion or use of innovations such as electric vehicles or solar panels, but overlooks or obscures downstream and upstream processes, such as mining or waste flows. Yet it is at these two extremes where emerging low-carbon transitions in mobility and electricity are effectively implicated in toxic pollution, biodiversity loss, exacerbation of gender inequality, exploitation of child labor, and the subjugation of ethnic minorities. We conceptualize these processes as part of an emerging “decarbonisation divide.” To illustrate this divide with clear insights for political ecology, sustainability transitions, and energy justice research, this study draws from extensive fieldwork examining cobalt mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), and the processing and recycling of electronic waste in Ghana. It utilizes original data from 34 semi-structured research interviews with experts and 69 community interviews with artisanal cobalt miners, e-waste scrapyard workers, and other stakeholders, as well as 50 site visits. These visits included 30 industrial and artisanal cobalt mines in the DRC, as well as associated infrastructure such as trading depots and processing centers, and 20 visits to the Agbogbloshie scrapyard and neighborhood alongside local waste collection sites, electrical repair shops, recycling centers, and community e-waste dumps in Ghana. The study proposes a concerted set of policy recommendations for how to better address issues of exploitation and toxicity, suggestions that go beyond the often-touted solutions of formalisation or financing. Ultimately, the study holds that we must all, as researchers, planners, and citizens, broaden the criteria and analytical parameters we use to evaluate the sustainability of low-carbon transitions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions
Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., et al. (2019) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 · Cited by 2,800
Self-citationEnergy justice: A conceptual review
Jenkins, K., McCauley, D., Heffron, R., Stephan, H., & Rehner, R. (2016) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.10.004 · Cited by 2,116
Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy
Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066 · Cited by 1,500
‘Globalizing’ regional development: a global production networks perspective
Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x · Cited by 1,439
Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization
Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao3760 · Cited by 1,017
Self-citationGlobal energy Transformation: A Roadmap to 2050
Gielen, D. J., Gorini, R., Wagner, N., Leme, R., Gutierrez, L., Prakash, G., Asmelash, E., Janeiro, L., Gallina, G., Vale, G., et al. (2019) · Cited by 966
E-waste: An overview on generation, collection, legislation and recycling practices
Kumar, A., Holuszko, M., & Espinosa, D. C. R. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.01.018 · Cited by 875
Recycling of WEEEs: An economic assessment of present and future e-waste streams
Cucchiella, F., D’Adamo, I., Lenny Koh, S. C., & Rosa, P. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.010 · Cited by 857
Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: Insights from political ecology
Lawhon, M., & Murphy, J. T. (2012) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132511427960 · Cited by 669
Srinivasan, S., O’Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2003) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.93.9.1446 · Cited by 588
Cited by
Sovacool, B. K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · Cited by 614
Self-citationA Perspective on the Sustainability of Cathode Materials used in Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Murdock, B. E., Toghill, K. E., & Tapia‐Ruiz, N. (2021) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202102028 · Cited by 462
Temper, L., Avila, S., Bene, D. D., Gobby, J., Kosoy, N., Billon, P. L., Martinez-Alier, J., Perkins, P., Roy, B., Scheidel, A., et al. (2020) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abc197 · Cited by 320
(2021) · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c · Cited by 251
Dunlap, A., & Riquito, M. (2023) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102912 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., Brock, A., & Turnheim, B.
- Venue
- Global Environmental Change
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 60
- Pages
- 102028
- ISSN
- 0959-3780 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2997520647
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 13.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The decarbonisation divide: Contextualizing landscapes of low-carbon exploitation and toxicity in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102028
- The paper
- Sovacool, B. K., Hook, A., Martiskainen, M., Brock, A., & Turnheim, B. (2020). The decarbonisation divide: Contextualizing landscapes of low-carbon exploitation and toxicity in Africa. Global Environmental Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.