Cited by 39Agriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentOutsourcing and Supply Chain ManagementAgricultural economics and policies

Agricultural outsourcing: A two-headed coin?

Open access
Azadi, Hossein, Houshyar, Ehsan, Zarafshani, Kiumars, Hosseininia, Gholamhossein, Witlox, Frank·2013·Global and Planetary Change

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.10.002

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Saudi agricultural consortium, Jenat, invested $400 million in food production in Sudan and Ethiopia after previously investing in 10,000 hectares of wheat, barley and livestock in Egypt.

    “For example, $400 million have been invested into food production in Sudan and Ethiopia by a consortium of Saudi Agricultural firm called Jenat, having previously invested in 10,000 hectares of wheat, barley and livestock in Egypt.(83,84)”

    From The era of sustainable agricultural development in Africa: Understanding the benefits and constraints (2018) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Introduction discusses Saudi Arabia as a country seeking foreign farmland, and section 2.2 discusses land deals in Ethiopia, but neither identifies Jenat or the investments claimed here. Searches for Jenat, $400 million, and the 10,000-hectare investment in Egypt found no passage addressing those details in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mehta, L., Veldwisch, G.J., Franco, J., 2012. Water Grabbing? Focus on the (Re)appropriation of Finite Water Resources. Water Alternatives 5(2), 193-207.
  2. Safransky, S., Wolford, W., 2011. Contemporary land grabs and their alternatives in the Americas. International Conference on Global Land Grabbing, University of Sussex, April 6-8, 2011.
  3. Simo J.A.M., 2011. Land grabbing, governance and social peace-building issues in Cameroon: Case study of the roles of elites in land deals and commoditisation in the North West Region, International Conference on Global Land Grabbing 6-8 April 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azadi, H., Houshyar, E., Zarafshani, K., Hosseininia, G., & Witlox, F.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR)
  • Razi University (IR)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Azadi, Hossein
Venue
Global and Planetary Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
100
Pages
20-27
ISSN
0921-8181 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069809380
Cited by
39
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global and Planetary Change (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  • European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
land grabbing, neocolonialism, host country impacts, European Green Deal, risk assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review