CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainable Development and Policies

Legitimating the governance of embodied emissions as a building block for sustainable energy transitions

Open access
Jordan, Nino David, Bleischwitz, Raimund·2020·Global Transitions
DOI 10.1016/j.glt.2020.01.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

• Presents important developments in governance of embodied emissions. • Empirical analysis of building industry as vanguard of embodied emissions governance. • Connects developments in building industry to potential breakthroughs in global climate governance. • Proposes legitimising dimensions crucial to governance of embodied emissions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.glt.2020.01.002

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Buy Clean California Act requires California to procure building materials below specified global warming potential levels verified by EPDs, and Colorado subsequently followed this example.

    “The Buy Clean California Act approved in October 2017 is an example. Partly to help ameliorate concerns about carbon leakage from the Californian ETS, it requires that the state only procures building materials below specified global warming potential (GWP) levels, verified by means of EPDs (60) (Section 3), an example subsequently followed by the State of Colorado.”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

  • Business associations and individual companies have already developed information systems on product and corporate footprints before government policies required them.

    “which details how business associations and individual companies have already developed information systems on product and corporate footprints, before any government policies have required those (60, 64).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [60]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Jordan, N. D., & Bleischwitz, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jordan, Nino David
ORCID
Venue
Global Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020
Volume
2
Pages
37-46
ISSN
2589-7918 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.glt.2020.01.002
OpenAlex
W3005329276
Cited by
12
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Global Transitions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Policies
Keywords
embodied emissions, construction industry, sustainable energy transition, climate governance, legitimacy, international climate governance, embodied carbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review