The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization
Open accessAbstract
The present study aims to develop two hybrid models to optimize the factors and enhance the predictive ability of the landslide susceptibility models. For this, a landslide inventory map was created with 406 historical landslides and 2030 non-landslide points, which was randomly divided into two datasets for model training (70%) and model testing (30%). 22 factors were initially selected to establish a landslide factor database. We applied the GeoDetector and recursive feature elimination method (RFE) to address factor optimization to reduce information redundancy and collinearity in the data. Thereafter, the frequency ratio method, multicollinearity test, and interactive detector were used to analyze and evaluate the optimized factors. Subsequently, the random forest (RF) model was used to create a landslide susceptibility map with original and optimized factors. The resultant hybrid models GeoDetector-RF and RFE-RF were evaluated and compared by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and accuracy. The accuracy of the two hybrid models (0.868 for GeoDetector-RF and 0.869 for RFE-RF) were higher than that of the RF model (0.860), indicating that the hybrid models with factor optimization have high reliability and predictability. Both RFE-RF GeoDetector-RF had higher AUC values, respectively 0.863 and 0.860, than RF (0.853). These results confirm the ability of factor optimization methods to improve the performance of landslide susceptibility models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Cited by
Enhancing Debris Flow Warning via Machine Learning Feature Reduction and Model Selection
Zhou, Q., Tang, H., Hibert, C., Chmiel, M., Walter, F., Dietze, M., & Turowski, J. M. (2025) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface · doi:10.1029/2024jf008094 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, X., Wen, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., & Zhang, W.
- Venue
- Geoscience Frontiers
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 101211
- ISSN
- 1674-9871 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159603761
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 66.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101211
- The paper
- Zhou, X., Wen, H., Zhang, Y., Xu, J., & Zhang, W. (2021). Landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid random forest with GeoDetector and RFE for factor optimization. Geoscience Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.