Cited by 75Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationWorkplace Health and Well-being

System influences on work disability due to low back pain: An international evidence synthesis

Open access
Bartys, Serena, Frederiksen, Pernille, Bendix, Tom, Burton, Kim·2017·Health Policy

Abstract

Work disability due to low back pain is a significant global health concern. Current policy and practice aimed at tackling this problem is largely informed by the biopsychosocial model. Resultant interventions have demonstrated some small-scale success, but they have not created a widespread decrease in work disability. This may be explained by the under-representation of the less measurable aspects in the biopsychosocial evidence base; namely the influence of relevant systems. Thus, a 'best-evidence' synthesis was conducted to collate the evidence on how compensatory (worker's compensation and disability benefits), healthcare and family systems (spouse/partner/close others) can act as obstacles to work participation for those with low back pain. Systematic searches of several scientific and grey literature sources were conducted, resulting in 1762 records. Following a systematic exclusion process, 57 articles were selected and the evidence was assessed using a system adapted from previous large-scale policy reviews conducted in this field. Results indicated how specific features of relevant systems could act as obstacles to individual efforts/interventions aimed at tackling work disability due to LBP. These findings reinforce the need for a 'whole-systems' approach, with all key players onside and have implications for the revision of current biopsychosocial-informed policy and practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.05.011

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]3. Tveito T, Halvorsen A, Lauvalien V, Eriksen H. Room for everyone in working life? 10% of employees -82% of the sickness absence. Norsk Epidemiologi. 2002;12:63-8.
  2. [47]47. Waddell G, Burton A. Concepts of rehabilitation for the management of common health problems. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:655-70.
  3. [55]55. Olenick A, Gluck J, Kenneth E. Factors affecting return to work following a compensable occupational back injury Am J Industr Med. 1996;30:540-55.
  4. [84]84. Foreman P, Murphy G, Swerissen H. Barriers and facilitators to return to work: a literature review. Melbourne: Australian Institute for Primary Care, La Trobe University; 2006.
  5. [88]88. Turner J, Franklin G, Fulton-Kehoe D, et al. Early predictors of chronic work disability: a prospective population-based study of workers with back injuries. Spine. 2008;33:2809-18.
  6. [99]99. Robinson J, Loeser J. Effect of worker's compensation systems in recovery from disabling injuries. In: Hasenbring M, Rusu A, Turk D, editors. From acute to chronic back pain. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. 100.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartys, S., Frederiksen, P., Bendix, T., & Burton, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • Metropolitan University College (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Bartys, Serena
Venue
Health Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
121
Issue
8
Pages
903-912
ISSN
0168-8510 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2619397736
Cited by
75
References
132
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Policy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
work disability, low back pain, workers' compensation, disability benefits, health care system, family systems, work participation, biopsychosocial model, whole systems approach, barriers to return to work
MeSH terms
Family, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Workers' Compensation, Low Back Pain, Insurance, Disability, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review