Cited by 265Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedical Practices and RehabilitationMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The Back Pain Beliefs of Health Care Providers: Are We Fear-Avoidant?

Linton, Steven J., Vlaeyen, Johan, Ostelo, Raymond·2002·Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to survey the level of fear-avoidance beliefs for practicing general practitioners and physical therapists and to relate this to self-reported practice behaviors for patients with back pain. To this end, 60 general practitioners and 71 physical therapists were recruited. These participants completed a questionnaire including 11 items slightly revised from instruments designed to assess fear-avoidance beliefs in patients, and four items about treatment practices. The results indicated that these health care practitioners on the average generally held beliefs that are consistent with the current evidence, but there were also indications that some practitioners held beliefs reflecting fear-avoidance. More than two-thirds reported that they would advise a patient to avoid painful movements, more than one-third believed a reduction in pain is a prerequisite for return-to-work, while more than 25% reported that they believe sick leave is a good treatment for back pain. These beliefs were found to be related to reported practice behavior. Those with high levels of fear-avoidance beliefs were compared to those with low levels. Those with high levels of fear-avoidance belief had an increased risk for believing sick leave to be a good treatment (RR = 2.0; 90%CI = 1.02-3.92), not providing good information about activities (RR = 1.7; 90%CI = 1.19-2.45), and being uncertain about identifying patients at risk for developing persistent pain problems (RR = 1.5; 90%CI = 1.00-2.27). It is concluded that some practitioners hold beliefs reflecting fear-avoidance and that these beliefs may influence treatment practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1020218422974

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such fears might present a barrier for the dissemination of Exposure treatments for CLBP.

    “Such fears might present a barrier for the dissemination of Exposure treatments for CLBP”
  • Practitioners scoring high on fear avoidance beliefs were much more likely to report that sick leave was a good treatment for pain.

    “Furthermore, those scoring high on fear avoidance beliefs were much more likely to report that sick leave was a good treatment for pain.”
  • In a survey of 60 general practitioners and 71 physical therapists, a number of practitioners had beliefs consistent with fear avoidance.

    “Results indicated that a number of practitioners had beliefs consistent with fear avoidance.”
  • Taken together, these findings suggest that health care providers might have pain-related fears that affect the way that they practice and respond to patients with back pain.

    “Taken together, these findings suggest that health care providers might have pain-related fears that affect the way that they practice and respond to patients with back pain.”
  • More than two thirds of the surveyed practitioners reported that they would recommend that a patient avoid painful movements.

    “More than two thirds of the practitioners reported that they would recommend that a patient avoid painful movements.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linton, S. J., Vlaeyen, J., & Ostelo, R.
Affiliations
  • Örebro University (SE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Linton, Steven J.
Venue
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Published
2002-12
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
223-232
ISSN
  • 1053-0487 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3688
OpenAlex
W1560747412
Cited by
265
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
fear-avoidance beliefs, back pain, general practitioners, physiotherapists, treatment behavior, sick leave, return to work, activity avoidance, chronic pain, patient information, practitioner beliefs
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Avoidance Learning, Disability Evaluation, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Male, Physician-Patient Relations, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Probability, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Risk Assessment, Statistics, Nonparametric, Health Care Surveys, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review