Cited by 82Career Development and DiversityHigher Education and EmployabilityDisability Education and Employment

The role of career decision self-efficacy as a mediator of peer support on students’ career adaptability

Open access
Agoes Salim, Rose Mini, Istiasih, Mirna Refolia, Rumalutur, Nur Aisyah, Biondi Situmorang, Dominikus David·2023·Heliyon

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of career decision self-efficacy (CDSE) as a mediator of the relationship between peer support and career adaptability among college students. Furthermore, students are in a realistic period of career development, but in reality, the level of adaptability is still low because the knowledge and career guidance in Indonesia only start at the college level, or at least high school. This condition makes recent graduates experience confusion in determining careers, thereby affecting their ability to adapt. One of the most influential external factors of career adaptability is peer support, where students spend more time with friends and provide information, career suggestions, emotional support, and being role models to each other. CDSE was selected as a moderator because career adaptability can be enhanced through self-efficacy sources. The participants used were final-year college students in Indonesia (N = 538). Data was then collected using convenience sampling techniques. The instruments used in this study include Career Adapt-Abilities Scale, Career-Related Peer Support, and Career Decision Self-Efficacy-Short Form. The results showed that CDSE fully mediated peer support on adaptability (c = 0.247; p < .001). Furthermore, peer support as an external factor is inadequate to enhance career adaptability. This indicates that internal factors are needed to help students adapt to changes in the working world and career choices. Students who o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14911

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social support positively contributes to CDMSE, career adaptability, and career-related behavior.

    “Recent studies have demostrated that social support positively contributes to CDMSE, career adaptability and career-related behavior by reinforcing individuals' confidence in managing career tasks and overcoming career-related uncertainty (Wang et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2024; Agoes Salim et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 76 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Agoes Salim, R. M., Istiasih, M. R., Rumalutur, N. A., & Biondi Situmorang, D. D.
Affiliations
University of Indonesia (ID)
Corresponding author
  • Istiasih, Mirna Refolia
  • Rumalutur, Nur Aisyah
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
e14911
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360998789
Cited by
64
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 5
FWCI
15.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
Keywords
career decision-making self-efficacy, peer support, career adaptability, mediation, university students, career development, career guidance, social support, career choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review