Social cognitive model of career self-management: toward a unifying view of adaptive career behavior across the life span.
Abstract
Social cognitive career theory (SCCT) currently consists of 4 overlapping, segmental models aimed at understanding educational and occupational interest development, choice-making, performance and persistence, and satisfaction/well-being. To this point, the theory has emphasized content aspects of career behavior, for instance, prediction of the types of activities, school subjects, or career fields that form the basis for people's educational/vocational interests and choice paths. However, SCCT may also lend itself to study of many process aspects of career behavior, including such issues as how people manage normative tasks and cope with the myriad challenges involved in career preparation, entry, adjustment, and change, regardless of the specific educational and occupational fields they inhabit. Such a process focus can augment and considerably expand the range of the dependent variables for which SCCT was initially designed. Building on SCCT's existing models, we present a social cognitive model of career self-management and offer examples of the adaptive, process behaviors to which it can be applied (e.g., career decision making/exploration, job searching, career advancement, negotiation of work transitions and multiple roles).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SCCT has been used for over 25 years, across numerous career settings, and within various underserved populations to explain career development.
“The model been used for over 25 years, across numerous career settings, and within various underserved populations to explain career development.20,21”
From Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Contextual supports in the form of mentors, peers, and academic resources, as well as barriers, including finances and grades, both directly and indirectly influenced career interests, choice goals, and subsequent career attainment, as evidenced by reasons for being off-track.
“In addition, contextual supports in the form of mentors, peers, and academic resources, as well as barriers, including finances and grades, both directly and indirectly influenced career interests, choice goals, and subsequent career attainment, as evidenced by reasons for being off-track.20”
From Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835 · see citing works
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510 · see citing works
Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis.
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.47.1.36 · Cited by 2,285 · see citing works
Self-citationColquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · Cited by 2,126 · see citing works
A social cognitive framework for career choice counseling
Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (1996) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.1996.tb00451.x · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445 · Cited by 2,119 · see citing works
Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M., & Nielsen, I. (2019) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Agoes Salim, R. M., Istiasih, M. R., Rumalutur, N. A., & Biondi Situmorang, D. D. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14911 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Dreams Realized: A Long-Term Program Evaluation of Three Summer Diversity Pipeline Programs
Stephenson-Hunter, C., Strelnick, A. H., Rodriguez, N., Stumpf, L. A., Spano, H., & Gonzalez, C. M. (2021) · Health Equity · doi:10.1089/heq.2020.0126 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
HEIs and workforce development: Helping undergraduates acquire career-readiness attributes
Mayorga, L. K. (2019) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.1177/0950422219875083 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Tang, M., Li, F., Miesing, P., Mei, M., & Xu, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.870655 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D.
- Affiliations
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Counseling Psychology
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 557-568
- ISSN
- 0022-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2009007278
- Cited by
- 1,398
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 253 · 2025: 188 · 2024: 157 · 2023: 127 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 67.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Counseling Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Keywords
- social cognitive career theory, career self-management, career behavior, career choice, career exploration, job search, career development, work transitions, multiple roles, lifespan
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Career Choice, Cognition, Decision Making, Goals, Humans, Models, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review