Cited by 44Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Determining medical students' anxiety and readiness levels about artificial intelligence

Open access
Özbek Güven, Gamze, Yilmaz, Şerife, Inceoğlu, Feyza·2024·Heliyon

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the levels of anxiety and readiness among medical students regarding artificial intelligence (AI) and examine the relationship between these factors. The research was conducted on medical students, and the data was collected through face-to-face and online surveys between April and June 2022. The study utilized a socio-demographic information form, an AI anxiety scale, and a medical AI readiness scale. The data collected from a total of 542 students were analyzed using the Statistical Program for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 25. Cronbach's α coefficient was used for reliability analysis. A path diagram was created using AMOS 24, and structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis was applied. The findings of the study indicate that medical students have a moderate level of readiness and a high level of anxiety regarding AI. Furthermore, an inverse relationship was found between AI readiness and AI anxiety. These results highlight the importance of increasing the preparedness of medical students for AI applications and reducing their anxieties. The study suggests the inclusion of AI in the medical curriculum and the development of a standardized curriculum to facilitate its teaching.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25894

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) was utilized in a few studies to explore perceptions of AI.

    “The Medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness Scale for Medical Students (MAIRS-MS) [30] was utilized in a few studies to explore perceptions of AI [31–34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Raykov T. Marcoulides G. second ed. Vol. 41 Fundamentals of Structural Equation Modeling: a First Course in Structural Equation Modeling 2006 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates London 1 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özbek Güven, G., Yilmaz, Ş., & Inceoğlu, F.
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
e25894
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391691299
Cited by
44
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Malatya Turgut Özal University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence, medical students, AI anxiety, AI readiness, medical education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review