Cited by 120Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Assessment of the Willingness of Radiologists and Radiographers to Accept the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Radiology Practice

Abuzaid, Mohamed M., Elshami, Wiam, Tekin, Huseyin, Issa, Bashar·2022·Academic Radiology

Abstract

Rationale and objectives This study aimed to investigate radiologists' and radiographers' knowledge, perception, readiness, and challenges regarding Artificial Intelligence (AI) integration into radiology practice.Materials and methods An electronically distributed cross-sectional study was conducted among radiologists and radiographers in the United Arab Emirates. The questionnaire captured the participants' demographics, qualifications, professional experience, and postgraduate training. Their knowledge, perception, organisational readiness, and challenges regarding AI integration into radiology were examined.Results There was a significant lack of knowledge and appreciation of the integration of AI into radiology practice. Organisations are stepping toward building AI implementation strategies. The availability of appropriate training courses is the main challenge for both radiographers and radiologists.Conclusion The excitement of AI implementation into radiology practise was accompanied by a lack of knowledge and effort required to improve the user's appreciation of AI. The knowledge gap requires collaboration between educational institutes and professional bodies to develop structured training programs for radiologists and radiographers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acra.2020.09.014

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abuzaid, M. M., Elshami, W., Tekin, H., & Issa, B.
Affiliations
University of Sharjah (AE)
Corresponding author
Abuzaid, Mohamed M.
Venue
Academic Radiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
87-94
ISSN
1076-6332 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097117814
Cited by
120
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 10
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence in radiology, radiologists, radiographers, AI adoption readiness, organizational readiness, training needs, employee training programs, implementation barriers
MeSH terms
Radiologists, Artificial Intelligence, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Radiography, Radiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review