Cited by 793Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Innovations and challenges in adsorption-based wastewater remediation: A comprehensive review

Open access
Satyam, Satyam, Patra, Sanjukta·2024·Heliyon

Abstract

Water contamination is an escalating emergency confronting communities worldwide. While traditional adsorbents have laid the groundwork for effective water purification, their selectivity, capacity, and sustainability limitations have driven the search for more advanced solutions. Despite many technological advancements, economic, environmental, and regulatory hurdles challenge the practical application of advanced adsorption techniques in large-scale water treatment. Integrating nanotechnology, advanced material fabrication techniques, and data-driven design enabled by artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have led to a new generation of optimized, high-performance adsorbents. These advanced materials leverage properties like high surface area, tailored pore structures, and functionalized surfaces to capture diverse water contaminants efficiently. With a focus on sustainability and effectiveness, this review highlights the transformative potential of these advanced materials in setting new benchmarks for water purification technologies. This article delivers an in-depth exploration of the current landscape and future directions of adsorbent technology for water remediation, advocating for a multidisciplinary approach to overcome existing barriers in large-scale water treatment applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29573

Cites

146 of 148 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A critical issue in regeneration of nanoadsorbents is the progressive decline in adsorption capacity with successive reuse cycles.

    “Another critical issue in the regeneration of nanoadsorbents is the progressive decline in adsorption capacity with successive reuse cycles.”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [249]

    The ‘Detailed analysis of current limitations—Recovery and reusability of adsorbents’ section (page unavailable) says that reusability tends to decrease because of surface or pore fouling. The ‘Advances to overcome current limitations—Recovery and reusability of adsorbents’ section discusses preserving capacity across multiple regeneration cycles, but the copy does not specifically establish a progressive decline in adsorption capacity for nanoadsorbents. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Magnetic nanoadsorbents enable rapid and energy-efficient recovery under an external magnetic field.

    “Magnetic nanoadsorbents have emerged as a promising strategy to overcome these limitations, enabling rapid and energy-efficient recovery under an external magnetic field.245,249”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [249]

    The 'Detailed analysis of current limitations > Recovery and reusability of adsorbents' section (page not provided) says magnetic adsorbents can be easily separated with an external magnetic field, reducing energy consumption. It does not establish that recovery is rapid. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This reduction in adsorption capacity is primarily attributed to irreversible surface fouling, pore blockage by organic or inorganic matter, and loss of active sites or functional groups during regeneration.

    “This reduction is primarily attributed to irreversible surface fouling, pore blockage by organic or inorganic matter, and loss of active sites or functional groups during regeneration.246,249”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [249]

    Table 2 in “Material degradation and stability” lists pore blockage and functional-group loss as challenges for some adsorbents; the “Adsorption capacity” section explains that porosity and functional groups affect capacity. The review does not establish irreversible surface fouling, identify organic or inorganic matter as the cause of blockage, or say these are the primary causes of capacity loss during regeneration. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of nanoadsorbent-based water treatment technologies are fundamentally determined by their ability to be regenerated and reused effectively.

    “The economic feasibility and environmental sustainability of nanoadsorbent-based water treatment technologies are fundamentally determined by their ability to be regenerated and reused effectively.”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [249]

    The Future prospects section says regeneration and reuse are essential to reducing waste and improving cost-effectiveness, and that effective regeneration can lower operating costs and environmental impact. But the Comparative evaluation section identifies synthesis costs and nanoparticle-release risks for nano-adsorbents, so the paper does not establish regeneration and reuse as the fundamental determinants of their economic and environmental viability. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Standardization of nanoadsorbent recycling practices remains insufficient, with inconsistent safety and performance guidelines across jurisdictions.

    “From a regulatory and practical perspective, the standardization of nanoadsorbent recycling practices remains insufficient, with inconsistent safety and performance guidelines across jurisdictions.249,251”

    From Emerging nanotechnology approaches for sustainable water treatment and heavy metals removal: a comprehensive review (2025) · cites this paper as [249]

    The ‘Regulatory and environmental challenges’ section says standards for adsorbent quality, performance, and safety lack clarity and consistency, and that requirements differ across countries and regions. It also discusses recycling-related environmental concerns, but does not specifically say that nanoadsorbent recycling practices lack standardization or that jurisdictions have inconsistent guidelines for those practices. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Majji K.R. Kachireddy V.N.S.R. Kuruva Nandyal S.K. Battula S.R. Role of nanomaterials: enhancing the adsorption efficiency of activated carbon in wastewater treatment, Clean Coal Technologies: beneficiation, Utilization Transport Phenomena and Prospective 2021 215 232 10.1007/978-3-030-68502-7_9/COVER · DOI
  2. [142]Alam G. Ihsanullah I. Naushad M. Sillanpää M. Applications of artificial intelligence in water treatment for optimization and automation of adsorption processes: recent advances and prospects Chem. Eng. J. 427 2022 130011 10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.130011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyam, S., & Patra, S.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Satyam, Satyam
  • Patra, Sanjukta
Venue
Heliyon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
e29573
ISSN
2405-8440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394980199
Cited by
788
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 425 · 2025: 322 · 2024: 41
FWCI
90.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Heliyon (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
  • Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
adsorption, wastewater remediation, adsorbents, water purification, nanomaterials, advanced materials, artificial intelligence, water pollution, functionalized surfaces, pore structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review