Cited by 43Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Understanding PFAS Adsorption: How Molecular Structure Affects Sustainable Water Treatment

Open access
Hamza, Muhammad, Ayinla, Ridwan T., Elsayed, Islam, Hassan, El Barbary·2025·Environments

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a broad group of synthetic chemicals characterized by strong carbon–fluorine bonds, making them highly persistent and widely distributed in the environment. Their chain length and functional head groups, such as sulfonate and carboxylate groups, determine key molecular properties like hydrophobicity, acidity, and sorption behavior. These properties significantly impact the effectiveness of PFAS removal from water systems. This review provides a structural classification of PFASs and explores removal strategies, with a particular emphasis on adsorption. It examines sustainable adsorbents, including both natural materials (e.g., cellulose, chitosan, lignin, and cyclodextrins) and engineered synthetic materials (e.g., covalent organic frameworks, metal–organic frameworks, and molecularly imprinted polymers). The discussion highlights important parameters such as chain length and functional chemistry, as these can greatly influence removal efficiency. Furthermore, the discussion addresses the adsorption mechanisms-such as electrostatic attraction, hydrophobic interaction, and fluorophilic interactions-to show how they contribute in different systems. By combining structural insights with adsorption performance data, this review aims to help design and select sustainable, high-performance adsorbents for efficiently reducing PFASs in contaminated water.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/environments12090330

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamza, M., Ayinla, R. T., Elsayed, I., & Hassan, E. B.
Affiliations
Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hassan, El Barbary
Venue
Environments
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-09-18
Volume
12
Issue
9
Pages
330
ISSN
2076-3298 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414330361
Cited by
43
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 1
FWCI
12.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environments (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • McIntire Stennis project (7001735)
  • USDA Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) in Madison, Wisconsin (7001735)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS adsorption, PFAS removal from water, structure-property relationships, chain length, hydrophobicity, adsorption mechanism, electrostatic attraction, hydrophobic interactions, sustainable adsorbents, natural adsorbents, covalent organic frameworks, metal-organic frameworks, molecularly imprinted polymers, cellulose, chitosan, lignin, cyclodextrins, water treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review