Cited by 98Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyDigital Marketing and Social MediaTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Effects of e-CRM on customer–bank relationship quality and outcomes: The case of Thailand

Sivaraks, Phavaphan, Krairit, Donyaprueth, Tang, John C.S.·2011·The Journal of High Technology Management Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hitech.2011.09.006

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 105 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sivaraks, P., Krairit, D., & Tang, J. C. S.
Affiliations
Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
Corresponding author
Krairit, Donyaprueth
Venue
The Journal of High Technology Management Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
141-157
ISSN
1047-8310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094950972
Cited by
98
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of High Technology Management Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
electronic customer relationship management, relationship outcomes, commercial banks, customer perspective, service quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review