Cited by 45Technostress in Professional SettingsEmployment and Welfare StudiesHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Anxiety about the speed of technological development: effects on job insecurity, time estimation, and automation level preference

Erebak, Serkan, Turgut, Tülay·2021·The Journal of High Technology Management Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hitech.2021.100419

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erebak, S., & Turgut, T.
Affiliations
  • Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (TR)
  • Marmara University (TR)
Corresponding author
Erebak, Serkan
Venue
The Journal of High Technology Management Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
100419
ISSN
1047-8310 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204779945
Cited by
45
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
FWCI
5.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of High Technology Management Research (publishedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
job insecurity, time estimation, human-robot collaboration, employee perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review