Cited by 73Atrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with concomitant left ventricular impairment: a systematic review of efficacy and effect on ejection fraction

Ganesan, Anand N., Nandal, Savvy, Lüker, Jakob, Pathak, Rajeev K., Mahajan, Rajiv, Twomey, Darragh, Lau, Dennis H., Sanders, Prashanthan·2015·Heart Lung and Circulation

Abstract

Introduction Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established rhythm control strategy; however, the impact of co-existing LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD) on ablation success is less well understood. This systematic review compiles the outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with LVSD.Methods An electronic database (Pubmed, Scopus, Embase) search using the keywords 'atrial fibrillation AND ablation AND (ventricular dysfunction OR heart failure OR cardiomyopathy)' was performed for English scientific literature up to 01/01/2014. 2484 references were retrieved and evaluated for relevance by three reviewers. Reviews and reference lists of retrieved articles were also examined to ensure all relevant studies were included. Data was extracted from 19 studies, including a total of 914 patients.Results Single-procedure success in LVSD patients for AF ablation was 56.5% (95% CI: 48%-64%). Overall multiple-procedure (including the use of anti-arrhythmic drugs) in LVSD patients for AF ablation was 81.8% (95% CI: 75%-87%). The mean increase in LVEF following AF ablation was 13.3% (95% CI: 10.8%-15.9%). Seven studies reported improvements in exercise capacity and quality of life information using standardised criteria. The pooled rate of serious adverse events was 5.5% (95% CI: 3.7%-8.1%).Conclusions Catheter ablation may be an effective therapy in AF patients with left ventricular systolic impairment, and can be associated with improvements in left ventricular function, quality of life, exercise capacity, and modest rates of serious adverse events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.09.012

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ganesan, A. N., Nandal, S., Lüker, J., Pathak, R. K., Mahajan, R., Twomey, D., Lau, D. H., & Sanders, P.
Affiliations
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Sanders, Prashanthan
Venue
Heart Lung and Circulation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
270-280
ISSN
1443-9506 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154258255
Cited by
73
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart Lung and Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Adelaide
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, left ventricular ejection fraction, ablation success, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, exercise capacity, quality of life, serious adverse events
MeSH terms
Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Ventricles, Humans, Stroke Volume, Catheter Ablation, PubMed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review