Cited by 19Anatomy and Medical TechnologyInnovations in Medical EducationUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experiential Learning, Spatial Visualization and Metacognition: An Exercise with the “Blank Page” Technique for Learning Anatomy

Open access
Naug, Helen L., Colson, Natalie J., Donner, Daniel·2016·Health Professions Education

Abstract

Purpose Undergraduate students in the allied health science disciplines are normally required to complete a human anatomy course in their first year. Such courses, while popular, present challenges in that the content requires students to engage different approaches to learning. Recent literature reflects an increased interest in active, experiential learning activities to improve the learning of anatomy and physiology, but activities that focus on the development of metacognitive skills and visual-spatial thinking have been lacking. To address these inadequacies we developed a plasticine modeling and drawing activity in a tutorial room devoid of resources and visual cues referred to as the “blank page” room. The purpose of this manuscript is to communicate the merits of this intervention as an instructional technique used to facilitate the learning of anatomy for undergraduates of allied health disciplines. Method During anatomy laboratory sessions we randomly allocated student groups to the activity of plasticine modeling and drawing (blank page technique) or the completion of written review questions. We compared the grades achieved by students who had been exposed to the blank page intervention with the grades achieved by students who were given standard review questions. We also collected qualitative feedback in the form of questionnaires that required participating students to rate the learning efficacy of the activities. Results Students performed slightly better on assessment quizzes after the blank page activity compared with the review questions. Student feedback indicated that the blank page activity had greater learning value and promoted stronger engagement in the learning tasks. Discussion The blank page activity has merit in student engagement and facilitation of the learning of anatomy by broadening the scope of instruction to encompass multimodal learning preferences, metacognition and visual spatial thinking.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.001

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Wilson, 2011, Changes in learning approaches in first-year medical students, Focus Health Prof Educ, 13, 65
  2. Schraw, 2006, Promoting self-regulation in science education: metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning, Res Sci Educ, 36, 111, 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Heikkilä, 2011, Interrelations among university students׳ approaches to learning, regulation of learning, and cognitive and attributional strategies: a person oriented approach, High Educ, 61, 513, 10.1007/s10734-010-9346-2 · DOI
  4. Fleming, 1998, Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection, Imp Aca, 11, 137, 10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x · DOI
  5. Lujan, 2006, First-year medical students prefer multiple learning styles, Adv Phys Educ, 3, 13, 10.1152/advan.00045.2005 · DOI
  6. Skinder-Meredith, 2010, Innovative activities for teaching anatomy of speech production, Ana Sci Educ, 3, 34
  7. Ward, 2008, The influence of study methods and knowledge processing on academic success and long term recall of anatomy learning by first year veterinary students, Ana Sci Educ, 1, 68, 10.1002/ase.12 · DOI
  8. Naug, 2011, Promoting metacognition in first year anatomy laboratories using plasticine modeling and drawing activities: a pilot study of the "blank page" technique, Ana Sci Educ, 4, 231, 10.1002/ase.228 · DOI
  9. Bareither, 2013, Clay modeling versus written modules as effective interventions in understanding human anatomy, Anat Sci Educ, 6, 170, 10.1002/ase.1321 · DOI
  10. Finn, 2011, The impact of color and role on retention of knowledge: a body-painting study within undergraduate medicine, Anat Sci Educ, 4, 311, 10.1002/ase.253 · DOI
  11. Motoike, 2009, Clay modeling as a method to learn human muscles: a community college study, Ana Sci Educ, 2, 19, 10.1002/ase.61 · DOI
  12. Oh, 2009, Learning of cross sectional anatomy using clay models, Ana Sci Educ, 2, 156, 10.1002/ase.92 · DOI
  13. Schraw, 2009, A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring, Metacog Learn, 4, 33, 10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3 · DOI
  14. Felder, 2005, Understanding student differences, J Eng Educ, 94, 57, 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x · DOI
  15. Joyce, 2007, Riding the wave: current and emerging trends in graduates from Australian university medical schools, Med J Aust, 186, 309, 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00907.x · DOI
  16. Morrone, 2005, Theoretical eclecticism in the college classroom, Inn High Educ, 30, 7, 10.1007/s10755-005-3290-6 · DOI
  17. Endres Howell, 2010, Sectioning clay models makes anatomy & development tangible, Am Biol Teach, 72, 313, 10.1525/abt.2010.72.5.12 · DOI
  18. Finn, 2010, A qualitative study of student responses to body painting, Anat Sci Educ, 3, 33, 10.1002/ase.119 · DOI
  19. Ranaweera, 2010, Students׳ illustrations of the human nervous system as a formative assessment tool, Anat Sci Educ, 3, 227, 10.1002/ase.162 · DOI
  20. Lord, 1990, Enhancing learning in the life sciences through spatial perception, Innov High Educ, 15, 5, 10.1007/BF00889733 · DOI
  21. Garg, 2001, How medical students learn spatial anatomy, Lancet, 357, 363, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03649-7 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Cohen, 2007, Individual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task, Appl Cogn Psychol, 21, 701, 10.1002/acp.1344 · DOI
  23. Mathewson, 1999, Visual-spatial thinking: an aspect of science overlooked by educators, Sci Educ, 83, 33, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1<33::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  24. Likova, 2012, Drawing enhances cross-modal memory plasticity in the human brain: a case study in a totally blind adult, Front Hum Neurosci, 6, 44, 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00044 · DOI
  25. Vorstenbosch, 2013, Learning anatomy enhances spatial ability, Anat Sci Educ, 6, 257, 10.1002/ase.1346 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Naug, H. L., Colson, N. J., & Donner, D.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Naug, Helen L.
Venue
Health Professions Education
Published
2016-06
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
51-57
ISSN
2452-3011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2343260649
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Professions Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
anatomy education, experiential learning, metacognition, spatial visualization, drawings, allied health students, student engagement, multimodal learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review