Keys to motivating tomorrow's workforce
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Future work may be marked by environmental uncertainty, interdependence, complexity, volatility and ambiguity.
“Future work might be characterized by environmental uncertainty interdependence, complexity, volatility and ambiguity52.”
From Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory (2022) · cites this paper as [52]
Cites
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563 · see citing works
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Affect was defined as a cognitive appraisal of one's performance (actions/behavior) in relation to one's goals (Locke & Latham, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMotivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971 · see citing works
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942 · see citing works
Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493 · Cited by 5,478 · see citing works
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181 · see citing works
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Leventhal, G. S. (1980) · Social Exchange · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_2 · Cited by 3,010 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Leventhal (1980) opined: “What shall we do with equity theory?””
BackgroundToward a theory of task motivation and incentives
Locke, E. A. (1968) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(68)90004-4 · Cited by 2,409 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory
Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Team Dispersion and Performance: The Role of Team Communication and Transformational Leadership
Eisenberg, J., Post, C., & DiTomaso, N. (2019) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496419827376 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
- Authors
- Latham, G. P., & Ernst, C. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Latham, Gary P.
- ORCID
- Latham, Gary P.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 181-198
- ISSN
- 1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038091864
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Resource Management Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Keywords
- employee motivation, future workforce, motivation theories, history of motivation research, organizational design, 21st century organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
