Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of the left atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using delayed-enhanced MRI: Implications for disease progression and response to catheter ablation

Open access
Mahnkopf, Christian, Badger, Troy J., Burgon, Nathan S., Daccarett, Marcos, Haslam, Thomas S., Badger, Christopher T., McGann, Christopher J., Akoum, Nazem, Kholmovski, Eugene, Macleod, Rob S., Marrouche, Nassir F.·2010·Heart Rhythm

Abstract

BACKGROUND Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is thought to be a benign type or an early stage of the disease. OBJECTIVE This study sought to compare the left atrium (LA) substrate using delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) in patients with lone AF versus those with comorbidities. METHODS Forty of 333 included patients met criteria for lone AF. All patients underwent DE-MRI to quantify atrial fibrosis as a marker for structural remodeling (SRM) and underwent catheter ablation. Based on the degree of SRM, patients were staged into 4 groups: Utah I (≤5% LA wall enhancement), Utah II (>5% to ≤20%), Utah III (>20% to ≤35%), or Utah IV (>35%). RESULTS Distribution in Utah I to IV was comparable in patients with lone AF and non–lone AF. In both groups, a number of patients showed extensive SRM. Mean enhancement (14.08 ± 8.94 vs. 16.94 ± 11.37) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .0721). In the lone AF group, catheter ablation was successful in suppressing AF in all of Utah I, 81.82% of Utah II, 62.5% of Utah III, and none of Utah IV patients. Similar results were achieved in the non–lone AF group. Outcome after ablation was significantly dependent on the SRM of the LA (P < .001). CONCLUSION The degree of LA structural remodeling as detected using DE-MRI is independent of AF type and associated comorbidities. Selecting appropriate treatment candidates based on the quality and quantity of atrial fibrosis using DE-MRI would improve procedural outcome and avoid unnecessary intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.030

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Mahnkopf, C., Badger, T. J., Burgon, N. S., Daccarett, M., Haslam, T. S., Badger, C. T., McGann, C. J., Akoum, N., Kholmovski, E., Macleod, R. S., & Marrouche, N. F.
Venue
Heart Rhythm
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
1475-1481
ISSN
1547-5271 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153755430
Cited by
334
References
1
FWCI
10.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the left atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using delayed-enhanced MRI: Implications for disease progression and response to catheter ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.030
The paper
Mahnkopf, C., Badger, T. J., Burgon, N. S., Daccarett, M., Haslam, T. S., Badger, C. T., McGann, C. J., Akoum, N., Kholmovski, E., Macleod, R. S., & Marrouche, N. F. (2010). Evaluation of the left atrial substrate in patients with lone atrial fibrillation using delayed-enhanced MRI: Implications for disease progression and response to catheter ablation. Heart Rhythm. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.06.030

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.