Cited by 49Cardiac Health and Mental HealthCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Patients' discharge experiences: Returning home after open-heart surgery

Lapum, Jennifer, Angus, Jan E., Peter, Elizabeth, Watt-Watson, Judy·2011·Heart & Lung

Abstract

Purpose This study explored patients' narratives of technology in heart surgery and recovery.Methods A narrative inquiry was conducted with a sample of 16 individuals. Interviews were completed 2 to 4 days after transfer from cardiovascular intensive care, and 4 to 6 weeks after discharge. Participants completed journals between these 2 time periods.Results Discharge and the return home were highlighted as key transitions. These transitions were driven by a technological script that included teachings and texts provided upon discharge. Complicating participants' narratives were their own personal dramas and self-characterizations of vulnerability, as they struggled to incorporate this script into the particularities of their daily lives.Conclusion Comprehensive conceptualizations of technology that involve the associated logics and pathways of recovery provide deep insights into patients' stories of recovery from heart surgery. It is salient that discharge programs consider the ways that technology enters into patients' narratives, and also consider dialogical approaches to communication, education, and supportive interventions that are offered at multiple intervals and continue in the home.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2010.01.001

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapum, J., Angus, J. E., Peter, E., & Watt-Watson, J.
Affiliations
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Lapum, Jennifer
Venue
Heart & Lung
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
226-235
ISSN
0147-9563 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075359857
Cited by
49
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heart & Lung (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Strategic Training Program for Cardiovascular Nurse Scientists
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Keywords
open heart surgery, hospital discharge, homecoming, postoperative recovery, patient narratives, medical technology, discharge education, vulnerability, care transitions, cardiovascular intensive care, patient education materials
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Coronary Artery Bypass, Attitude to Death, Convalescence, Coronary Care Units, Disability Evaluation, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Helplessness, Learned, Home Nursing, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Ontario, Patient Discharge, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Social Adjustment, Medical Laboratory Science, Refusal to Treat, Patient Satisfaction, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation, Narration, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review