Cited by 68International Business and FDIFranchising Strategies and PerformanceInnovation and Knowledge Management

Foreign ownership strategies of UK and US international franchisors: An exploratory application of Dunning's envelope paradigm

Dunning, John H., Pak, Yong Suhk, Beldona, Sam·2007·International Business Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2007.01.005

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunning, J. H., Pak, Y. S., & Beldona, S.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
  • Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pak, Yong Suhk
Venue
International Business Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
531-548
ISSN
0969-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061964839
Cited by
68
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Business Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Yonsei University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › International Business and FDI
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Franchising Strategies and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
franchising, foreign ownership, OLI paradigm, foreign market entry strategy, exploitation and exploration, location advantage, ownership advantages, internalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review