The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update
(2003) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748 · Cited by 11,791
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross-cultural validation
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Saarinen, L. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1999.tb00337.x · Cited by 1,882 · cited 1×
“Reputation refers to the citizens’ belief that an agency is honest and concerned about its citizens (Jarvenpaa et al., 1999).”
BackgroundLinking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government
Welch, E. W. (2004) · Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory · doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021 · Cited by 1,222
The Effects of E‐Government on Trust and Confidence in Government
Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x · Cited by 1,092
Weerakkody, V., & Dhillon, G. (2008) · International Journal of Electronic Government Research · doi:10.4018/jegr.2008100101 · Cited by 160
Self-citation
Cited by
Veeramootoo, N., Nunkoo, R., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.004 · Cited by 394
An experimental study of public trust in AI chatbots in the public sector
Aoki, N. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101490 · Cited by 350
Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Daowd, A. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101458 · Cited by 51
Self-citationWhy are experienced users of WeChat likely to continue using the app?
Gong, X., Liu, Z., Zheng, X., & Wu, T. (2018) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-10-2017-0246 · Cited by 47
Malaysian urban poor adoption of e-government applications and their satisfaction
Shuib, L., Yadegaridehkordi, E., & Ainin, S. (2019) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2019.1565293 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V.
- Venue
- International Business Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 164-175
- ISSN
- 0969-5931 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2506796008
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 28.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004
- The paper
- Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
