Cited by 20Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

Of Horseshoes and Heliotropes: Dynamics of Dust in the Encke Gap

Open access
Hedman, M.M., Burns, J.A., Hamilton, D.P., Showalter, M.R.·2013·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.11.036

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Moons embedded within a ring can carve out a gap proportional to their Hill radius.

    “Secondly, moons embedded within the ring can carve out a gap proportional to their Hill radius.”

    From A Self-Gravitating Exoring Around J1407b and Implications for In-Situ Exomoon Formation (2022) · cites this paper as Hedman et al., 2013

    Section 2 (p. 3) says Pan’s gravity perturbs particles in the Encke Gap and that its Hill radius sets the scale of the illustrated orbital structures. It does not establish that the width of a gap carved by an embedded moon is proportional to its Hill radius; the cited estimate for the chaotic zone has a different mass scaling. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gr¨ un, E., G. E. Morfill, and D. A. Mendis 1984. Dust-magnetosphere interactions. In R. Greenberg and A. Brahic (Eds.), IAU Colloq. 75: Planetary Rings , pp. 275-332.
  2. Hor´ anyi, M., J. A. Burns, M. M. Hedman, G. H. Jones, and S. Kempf 2009. Diffuse rings. In Dougherty, M. K., Esposito, L. W., & Krimigis, S. M. (Ed.), Saturn from CassiniHuygens , pp. 511-536. Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, M. M., Burns, J. A., Hamilton, D. P., & Showalter, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (US)
Corresponding author
Hedman, M.M.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
252-276
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978754578
Cited by
20
References
35
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
NASA Cassini Data Analysis Program (NNX09AE74G, NNX12AC29G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Saturn rings, ringlets, Pan, ring particle dynamics, solar radiation pressure, orbital eccentricity, gravitational perturbations, particle collisions, Cassini imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review