Cited by 29Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

The shape and dynamics of a heliotropic dusty ringlet in the Cassini Division

Open access
Hedman, M.M., Burt, J.A., Burns, J.A., Tiscareno, M.S.·2010·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.06.017

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Much of the finer scale structure in the Cassini Division is still not understood and has no apparent association with perturbing satellites.

    “However, much of the finer scale structure is still not understood and has no apparent association with perturbing satellites (French et al 2010; Hedman et al 2010; French et al 2016).”

    From Mean motion resonances with nearby moons: an unlikely origin for the gaps observed in the ring around the exoplanet J1407b (2019) · cites this paper as Hedman et al 2010

    The Interpretation (p. 24) says the Charming Ringlet’s free eccentricity and inclination are difficult to explain, and §7.2.1 (p. 26) argues against large source bodies within that ringlet. These passages concern one ringlet; they do not establish that much of the Cassini Division’s finer-scale structure is unexplained or has no apparent association with perturbing satellites. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The moon Mimas plays a role in causing some of the structure in the Cassini Division and apparent gap.

    “The moon does indeed play a role in causing some of the structure in the Cassini Division and apparent gap.”

    From Mean motion resonances with nearby moons: an unlikely origin for the gaps observed in the ring around the exoplanet J1407b (2019) · cites this paper as Hedman et al 2010

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes a ringlet in the Cassini Division and attributes its heliotropic behavior to possible solar radiation pressure. Searches for Mimas and moon-driven structure found no passage in our copy addressing whether Mimas causes structure in the division or its apparent gap. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baierlein, R. 1983. Newtonian Dynamics . McGraw-Hill.
  2. Hor´ anyi, M., J. A. Burns, M. M. Hedman, G. H. Jones, and S. Kempf 2009. Diffuse Rings. In Dougherty, M. K., Esposito, L. W., & Krimigis, S. M. (Ed.), Saturn from CassiniHuygens , pp. 511-536. Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hedman, M. M., Burt, J. A., Burns, J. A., & Tiscareno, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Hedman, M.M.
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
210
Issue
1
Pages
284-297
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133390087
Cited by
29
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Cassini Division, Saturn rings, solar radiation pressure, ring eccentricity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review