Cited by 81Astro and Planetary ScienceAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchSpace Satellite Systems and Control

The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope as a Near-Earth Object discovery machine

Open access
Jones, R. Lynne, Slater, Colin T., Moeyens, Joachim, Allen, Lori, Axelrod, Tim, Cook, Kem, Ivezić, Željko, Jurić, Mario +2 more·2018·Icarus

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.icarus.2017.11.033

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • After accounting for differences in input assumptions and models, each of the independent works (Jones et al. 2018; Vereš & Chesley 2017a, 2017b; Grav et al. 2016) calculates a completeness value that is consistent within a few percent.

    “After accounting for differences in their input assumptions and models, each of these independent works calculates a completeness value that is consistent within a few percent.”

    From LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products (2019) · cites this paper as Jones et al. 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Becker, A. C., Rest, A., Stubbs, C., et al. 2005, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 225, Gravitational Lensing Impact on Cosmology, ed. Y. Mellier & G. Meylan, 357-362
  2. Connolly, A. J., Angeli, G. Z., Chandrasekharan, S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9150, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, ed. G. Z. Angeli & P. Dierickx, 14
  3. Delgado, F., Saha, A., Chandrasekharan, S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9150, Modeling, Systems Engineering, and Project Management for Astronomy VI, ed. G. Z. Angeli & P. Dierickx, 15
  4. Ivezi´ c, ˇ Z., Tyson, J. A., Abel, B., et al. 2008, ArXiv e-prints, arXiv:0805.2366 · arXiv
  5. Jones, R. L., Yoachim, P., Chandrasekharan, S., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9149, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems V, ed. A. B. Peck, C. R. Benn, & R. L. Seaman, 0
  6. Larson, S., Beshore, E., Hill, R., et al. 2003, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 35, AAS/Division for Planetary Sciences Meeting Abstracts #35, 982

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, R. L., Slater, C. T., Moeyens, J., Allen, L., Axelrod, T., Cook, K., Ivezić, Ž., Jurić, M., Myers, J., & Petry, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Corporation (US)
Venue
Icarus
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
303
Pages
181-202
ISSN
0019-1035 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772327797
Cited by
81
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Icarus (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1258333)
  • Department of Energy (DE-AC02-76SF00515)
  • SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  • LSSTC Institutional Members
  • Washington Research Foundation Data Science Term Chair fund
  • University of Washington
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
LSST, near-Earth objects, potentially hazardous asteroids, asteroid discovery, false detection rate, image differencing, survey strategy, detection completeness, Dark Energy Camera, survey simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review