Policy specification and verification for blockchain and smart contracts in 5g networks
Open accessAbstract
Blockchain offers unprecedented opportunities for innovation in financial transactions. A whole new world of opportunities for banking, lending, insurance, money transfer, investments, and stock markets awaits. However, the potential for wide-scale adoption of blockchain is hindered with cybersecurity and privacy issues. We provide an overview of the risks and security requirements and give an outlook for future research that could be helpful in solving some of the challenges. We also present an approach for policy specification and verification of financial transactions based on smart contracts.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A decentralized storage IPFS run by blockchain combined with cloud computing makes data sharing more efficient in low latency, easy data management and improved data privacy compared to centralized cloud architectures.
“In particular, a decentralized storage IPFS run by blockchain is combined with cloud computing to make data sharing more efficient in terms of low latency, easy data management and improved data privacy, compared to centralized cloud architectures.”
From Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey (2020) · cites this paper as [243]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A systematic literature review of blockchain cyber security
Taylor, P. J., Dargahi, T., Dehghantanha, A., Parizi, R. M., & Choo, K. R. (2019) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2019.01.005 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
When Mobile Blockchain Meets Edge Computing
Xiong, Z., Zhang, Y., Niyato, D. T., Wang, P., & Han, Z. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1701095 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Capitalism without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy
Haskel, J. E., & Westlake, S. (2017) · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Edgechain: an edge-IoT framework and prototype based on blockchain and smart contracts
Pan, J., Wang, J., Hester, A., Alqerm, I., Liu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2878154 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
A formal role-based access control model for security policies in multi-domain mobile networks
Ünal, D., & Çağlayan, M. U. (2012) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.09.018 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Security Software Development: Assessing and Managing Security Risks
Ashbaugh, D. A. (2008) · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Huawei Inc. and Oxford Economics, Digital Spillover: Measuring the Impact of the Digital Economoy, Sept. 2017. URL: https://www.huawe i.com/minisite/gci/en/digital-spillover/index.html. Accessed 30/5/2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain for 5G and beyond networks: A state of the art survey
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102693 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
- Authors
- Unal, D., Hammoudeh, M., & Kiraz, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
- ORCID
- Hammoudeh, Mohammad
- Venue
- ICT Express
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-47
- ISSN
- 2405-9595 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2962170189
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 11.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ICT Express (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Keywords
- blockchain, smart contracts, 5G, policy specification, policy verification, financial transactions, cybersecurity, privacy, security requirements, blockchain adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
