CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30Food Drying and ModelingHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaNMR spectroscopy and applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiphysics pore-scale model for the rehydration of porous foods

Open access
van der Sman, R.G.M., Vergeldt, F.J., Van As, H., van Dalen, G., Voda, A., van Duynhoven, J.P.M.·2014·Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
DOI 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.11.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this paper we present a pore-scale model describing the multiphysics occurring during the rehydration of freeze-dried vegetables. This pore-scale model is part of a multiscale simulation model, which should explain the effect of microstructure and pre-treatments on the rehydration rate. Simulation results are compared to experimental data, obtained by MRI and XRT. Time scale estimates based on the pore-scale model formulation agree with the experimental observations. Furthermore, the pore-scale simulation model provides a plausible explanation for the strongly increased rehydration rate, induced by the blanching pre-treatment.The increased insight in the physical processes governing the rehydration of porous or freeze-dried foods gives more rationale for optimizing all processing steps. Industry is seeking for means to give dried fruits and vegetables more convenience, but also higher quality concerning health and texture. This study shows that blanching pretreatment prior to freeze-drying strongly enhances the rehydration, while the loss of nutrients is hardly affected.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ifset.2013.11.008

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van der Sman, 2013, Coarse-grained model of rehydration of porous foods, Transport in Porous Media

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 30

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
van der Sman, R. G. M., Vergeldt, F. J., Van As, H., van Dalen, G., Voda, A., & van Duynhoven, J. P. M.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Unilever Research and Development Vlaardingen (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
24
Pages
69-79
ISSN
1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.ifset.2013.11.008
OpenAlex
W2037731179
Cited by
30
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Drying and Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › NMR spectroscopy and applications
Keywords
rehydration, pore-scale modeling, multiphysics, multiscale modeling, blanching pretreatment, rehydration rate, food microstructure, nutrient loss, magnetic resonance imaging, X-ray tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review