The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of Green Food Processing techniques. Preservation, transformation, and extraction
Open accessAbstract
This review presents innovative food processing techniques and their role in promoting sustainable food industry. These techniques (such as microwave, ultrasound, pulse electric field, instant controlled pressure drop, supercritical fluid processing) in the frontiers of food processing, food chemistry, and food microbiology, are not new and were already used for> 30 years by academia and industry. We will pay special attention to the strategies and the tools available to make preservation, transformation and extraction greener and present them as success stories for research, education and at industrial scale. The design of green and sustainable processes is currently a hot research topic in food industry. Herein we aimed to describe a multifaceted strategy (innovative technologies, process intensification, bio-refinery concept) to apply this concept at research, educational, and industrial level. Industrial relevance: Green Food Processing could be a new concept to meet the challenges of the 21st century, to protect both the environment and consumers, and in the meantime enhance competition of industries to be more ecologic, economic and innovative. This green approach should be the result of a whole chain of values in both senses of the term: economic and responsible, starting from the production and harvesting of food raw materials, processes of preservation, transformation, and extraction together with formulation and marketing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
HERRERO, M., CIFUENTES, A., & IBANEZ, E. (2006) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.058 · Cited by 1,212
Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction in Food Analysis
Chemat, F., Tomao, V., & Virot, M. (2008) · Handbook of Food Analysis Instruments · doi:10.1201/9781420045673.ch5 · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Cited by
Kumar, K., Srivastav, S., & Sharanagat, V. S. (2021) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105325 · Cited by 1,312
A review of sustainable and intensified techniques for extraction of food and natural products
Chemat, F., Abert Vian, M., Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S., Nutrizio, M., Režek Jambrak, A., Munekata, P. E. S., Lorenzo, J. M., Barba, F. J., Binello, A., & Cravotto, G. (2020) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c9gc03878g · Cited by 747
Self-citationAdvances in ultrasound assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from cash crops–A review
Wen, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Dzah, C. S., Zandile, M., Duan, Y., Ma, H., & Luo, X. (2018) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.07.018 · Cited by 721
Marić, M., Grassino, A. N., Zhu, Z., Barba, F. J., Brnčić, M., & Rimac Brnčić, S. (2018) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.022 · Cited by 678
Rahman, M. M., & Lamsal, B. P. (2021) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12709 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Chemat, F., Rombaut, N., Meullemiestre, A., Turk, M., Perino, S., Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S., & Abert-Vian, M.
- Venue
- Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 41
- Pages
- 357-377
- ISSN
- 1466-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2610346906
- Cited by
- 850
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 59.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of Green Food Processing techniques. Preservation, transformation, and extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.016
- The paper
- Chemat, F., Rombaut, N., Meullemiestre, A., Turk, M., Perino, S., Fabiano-Tixier, A.-S., & Abert-Vian, M. (2017). Review of Green Food Processing techniques. Preservation, transformation, and extraction. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.04.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
