A comparison of outcomes of virtual school courses offered in synchronous and asynchronous formats
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Students in asynchronous courses were more likely to rate their courses as more difficult and time consuming compared to traditional classes.
“Students in asynchronous courses were more likely to rate their courses as more difficult and time consuming compared to traditional classes.”
From Student experience using synchronous and asynchronous instruction in mathematics classes (2024) · cites this paper as Roblyer et al., 2007
Later studies found no differences between synchronous and asynchronous teaching delivery modes, although students prefer synchronous course sessions.
“However, subsequent studies showed no differences between synchronous and asynchronous teaching delivery modes (Roblyer et al., 2007), pointing out that both types are effective in delivering online teaching, even though students show preference for synchronous course sessions (Skylar, 2009).”
From Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study (2021) · cites this paper as Roblyer et al., 2007
Cites
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074003379 · Cited by 1,761 · see citing works
Kozma, R. B. (1991) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543061002179 · Cited by 1,429 · see citing works
Evidence for confounding in computer-based instruction studies: Analyzing the meta-analyses
Clark, R. E. (1985) · ECTJ · doi:10.1007/bf02769362 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Roblyer, M. D. (2007) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713 · Cited by 693 · see citing works
Student experience using synchronous and asynchronous instruction in mathematics classes
Mohammad, N. M., Nica, M., Kraus, D., Levere, K. M., & Okner, R. (2024) · Pedagogical Research · doi:10.29333/pr/14244 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Another study done as part of the Alabama ACCESS Distance Learning Program looked at comparisons between online (asynchronous) and interactive videoconferencing (synchronous) (Roblyer et al., 2007).”
Background
- Authors
- Roblyer, M. D., Freeman, J., Donaldson, M. B., & Maddox, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Tennessee at Chattanooga (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roblyer, M.D.
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 261-268
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006438671
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- online schooling, synchronous distance learning, asynchronous distance learning, interactive videoconferencing, online course management, formative assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review