The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581
Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · Cited by 4,849
Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923640109527071 · Cited by 3,044
The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs
Bonk, C. J., Graham, C. R., Cross, J., & Moore, M. G. (2005) · Cited by 2,583
Self-citationBlended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions
Graham, C. R. (2006) · Cited by 1,765
Self-citationThe effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811311500307 · Cited by 1,638
So, H.-J., & Brush, T. A. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009 · Cited by 1,221
A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309333844 · Cited by 1,171
Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. (2004) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192 · Cited by 1,078
A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment
Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012 · Cited by 1,001
Cited by
Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701 · Cited by 1,472
Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481 · Cited by 437
Self-citationHeilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3 · Cited by 381
Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education
Lee, J., Lim, C., & Kim, H. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1 · Cited by 286
Effectiveness of Gamification Elements in Blended Learning Environments
MESE, C., & DURSUN, O. O. (2019) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.601914 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R.
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 20-34
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965060372
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 61
- FWCI
- 76.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
- The paper
- Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
