Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Online learning flexibility often leads students to face difficulties in self-regulation skills.
“However, this flexibility often leads students to face difficulties in self-regulation skills (Rasheed et al., 2020).”
From You have a notification: the role of push notifications in shaping students’ engagement, self-regulation and academic procrastination (2025) · cites this paper as Rasheed et al., 2020
The autonomous nature of blended learning can pose challenges in maintaining consistent teacher support, which may impact the development of students' SRL and HOTS.
“However, the autonomous nature of blended learning can pose challenges in maintaining consistent teacher support, which may impact the development of students' SRL and HOTS (Rasheed et al., 2020).”
From Empowering ChatGPT with Guidance Mechanism in Blended Learning: Effect of Self-Regulated Learning, Higher-Order Thinking Skills, and Knowledge Construction (2024) · cites this paper as Rasheed et al., 2020
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group* (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 · Cited by 37,554 · see citing works
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604 · see citing works
Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance
Broadbent, J. (2017) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification
Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001 · Cited by 580 · see citing works
Overcoming procrastination? A meta-analysis of intervention studies
van Eerde, W., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2018) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.002 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Implementing flipped classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system into learning process
Mohamed, H., & Lamia, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.011 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Investigating temporal access in a flipped classroom: procrastination persists
AlJarrah, A., Thomas, M. K., & Shehab, M. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0083-9 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Factors Influencing Students' Help-Seeking Behavior while Programming with Human and Computer Tutors
Price, T. W., Liu, Z., Cateté, V., & Barnes, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3105726.3106179 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00260-3 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Lee, H.-Y., Chen, P.-H., Wang, W.-S., Huang, Y.-M., & Wu, T.-T. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“In blended learning environments, which integrate face-to-face and online instruction, learners are granted the autonomy to tailor their learning objectives and pace (Rasheed et al., 2020; Snodin, 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialBizami, N. A., Tasir, Z., & Kew, S. N. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11243-w · Cited by 226 · see citing works
A systematic review of systematic reviews on blended learning: trends, gaps and future directions
Ashraf, M. A., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Denden, M., Tlili, A., Liu, J., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2021) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s331741 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Evaluating the effectiveness of blended learning using the <scp>ARCS</scp> model
Ma, L., & Lee, C. S. (2021) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12579 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Huang, C., Han, Z., Li, M., Wang, X., & Zhao, W. (2021) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.6749 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
CARATIQUIT, K. D., & CARATIQUIT, L. J. C. (2023) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.1060563 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Hence, academic procrastinators have a lower capacity for self-regulation, which has a detrimental effect on performance in online courses (Rasheed et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPikhart, M., Klimova, B., & Al-Obaydi, L. H. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1412377 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Mumcu, B. B., & Çebi, A. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00537-x · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“The nature of online learning environments, which offer flexibility and individual control, exacerbates students’ difficulties in time management and increases procrastination behaviors (Rasheed et al., 2020).”
InfluentialAcademic Coaching in Entry-level Doctor of Physical Therapy Education
Black, K., Feda, J., Reynolds, B., Cutrone, G., & Gagnon, K. (2025) · Journal of Physical Therapy Education · doi:10.1097/jte.0000000000000378 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Malaya (MY)
- Corresponding author
- Kamsin, Amirrudin
- Venue
- Computers & Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 144
- Pages
- 103701
- ISSN
- 0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2972324304
- Cited by
- 1,472
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 176 · 2025: 197 · 2024: 285 · 2023: 302 · 2022: 274 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 34.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universiti Malaya
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- blended learning, student self-regulation, teacher challenges, educational technology, educational institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
