The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social Media in academic practices
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This study aims at providing empirical evidence on how higher education scholars are using Social Media for personal, teaching and professional purposes. A survey tool was addressed to the entire Italian academic staff, with a response rate of 10.5% corresponding to 6139 responses. The study takes into account a number of socio-demographic variables such as gender, age, numbers of years of teaching, academic title, and academic discipline. It also explores the relationship between the different kinds of use, the relationship between frequency of use of Social Media and online and/or blended teaching, as well as the use of institutional e-learning systems. The results show that Social Media use is still rather limited and restricted and that the variable most associated with frequency of use is scientific discipline. In addition, age and seniority seem to influence the adoption of Social Media. The results also revealed that frequency of personal use is mostly associated with the frequency of professional use more than with the frequency of teaching use. They also show that prior experience with e-learning or blended learning is greatly associated with Social Media use. Overall, the study emphasises a generally more favourable attitude towards personal sharing and connecting with peers in professional networks rather than integrating these devices into their teaching practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Facebook and academic performance
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 · Cited by 1,578
Effect of online social networking on student academic performance
Paul, J. A., Baker, H. M., & Cochran, J. D. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.016 · Cited by 426
Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use
McAndrew, F. T., & Jeong, H. S. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.007 · Cited by 425
Cited by
Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube
Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001 · Cited by 398
Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook
Manca, S. (2020) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707 · Cited by 347
Self-citationRozgonjuk, D., Kattago, M., & Täht, K. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.003 · Cited by 176
Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., & Gosse, C. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818781324 · Cited by 173
Teaching “Against” Social Media: Confronting Problems of Profit in the Curriculum
Krutka, D. G., Manca, S., Galvin, S. M., Greenhow, C., Koehler, M. J., & Askari, E. (2019) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811912101410 · Cited by 97
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Manca, S., & Ranieri, M.
- Venue
- The Internet and Higher Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 29
- Pages
- 63-74
- ISSN
- 1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2209351416
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social Media in academic practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.004
- The paper
- Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). “Yes for sharing, no for teaching!”: Social Media in academic practices. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.