The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resistance to colistin: what is the fate for this antibiotic in pig production?
Open accessAbstract
Colistin, a cationic polypeptide antibiotic, has reappeared in human medicine as a last-line treatment option for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). Colistin is widely used in veterinary medicine for the treatment of gastrointestinal infections caused by Enterobacteriaceae. GNB resistant to colistin owing to chromosomal mutations have already been reported both in human and veterinary medicine, however several recent studies have just identified a plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene encoding for colistin resistance in Escherichia coli colistin resistance. The discovery of a non-chromosomal mechanism of colistin resistance in E. coli has led to strong reactions in the scientific community and to concern among physicians and veterinarians. Colistin use in food animals and particularly in pig production has been singled out as responsible for the emergence of colistin resistance. The present review will focus mainly on the possible link between colistin use in pigs and the spread of colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. First we demonstrate a possible link between Enterobacteriaceae resistance emergence and oral colistin pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and its administration modalities in pigs. We then discuss the potential impact of colistin use in pigs on public health with respect to resistance. We believe that colistin use in pig production should be re-evaluated and its dosing and usage optimised. Moreover, the search for competitive alternatives to using colistin with swine is of paramount importance to preserve the effectiveness of this antibiotic for the treatment of MDR-GNB infections in human medicine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions
Laxminarayan, R., Duse, A., Wattal, C., Zaidi, A. K. M., Wertheim, H. F. L., Sumpradit, N., Vlieghe, E., Hara, G. L., Gould, I. M., Goossens, H., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70318-9 · Cited by 4,439
Fortifying the barrier: the impact of lipid A remodelling on bacterial pathogenesis
Needham, B. D., & Trent, M. S. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3047 · Cited by 565
Cited by
Carattoli, A., Villa, L., Feudi, C., Curcio, L., Orsini, S., Luppi, A., Pezzotti, G., & Magistrali, C. F. (2017) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.31.30589 · Cited by 533
Borowiak, M., Fischer, J., Hammerl, J. A., Hendriksen, R. S., Szabo, I., & Malorny, B. (2017) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkx327 · Cited by 533
Metabolic mechanism of colistin resistance and its reverting in Vibrio alginolyticus
Li, L., Su, Y., Peng, B., Peng, X., & Li, H. (2020) · Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1111/1462-2920.15021 · Cited by 74
Ohene Larbi, R., Adeapena, W., Ayim-Akonor, M., Ansa, E. D. O., Tweya, H., Terry, R. F., Labi, A.-K., & Harries, A. D. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191610449 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhouma, M., Beaudry, F., & Letellier, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-126
- ISSN
- 0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2345854975
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resistance to colistin: what is the fate for this antibiotic in pig production? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.008
- The paper
- Rhouma, M., Beaudry, F., & Letellier, A. (2016). Resistance to colistin: what is the fate for this antibiotic in pig production? International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.