Cited by 61Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal Infections and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In vitro activity of olorofim (F901318) against fungi of the genus, Scedosporium and Rasamsonia as well as against Lomentospora prolificans, Exophiala dermatitidis and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus

Kirchhoff, Lisa, Dittmer, Silke, Buer, Jan, Rath, Peter-Michael, Steinmann, Joerg·2020·International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents

Abstract

In recent decades, invasive infections caused by fungal pathogens have been reported with increasing frequency. Concurrently, the rates of detected resistance mechanisms against commonly used antifungal agents in fungi are increasing. The need for novel antifungal drugs is thus imminent. In this study, the novel drug olorofim (F901318) was tested for its antifungal activity against the human fungal pathogens Lomentospora prolificans (n = 20), Scedosporium aurantiacum (n = 2), Scedosporium apiospermum (n = 6), Rasamsonia argillacea species complex (n = 23), Exophiala dermatitidis (n = 10) and azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAF) (n = 25) in an in vitro broth microdilution assay according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations. Whilst olorofim was ascertained to be effective against R. argillacea species complex [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≤0.008 mg/L], Scedosporium spp. (MICs of 0.032-0.5 mg/L), L. prolificans (MICs of 0.032-0.5 mg/L) and ARAF (MICs of ≤0.008-0.032 mg/L), the drug had an MIC of >4 mg/L against E. dermatitidis. These data demonstrate the antifungal activity of olorofim against a broad range of filamentous fungal pathogens.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106105

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fosmanogepix and olorofim are active against the multidrug-resistant, pan-resistant mold genera Lomentospora and Scedosporium.

    “Fosmanogepix and olorofim also possess activity against notoriously MDR pan-resistant mold genera, Lomentospora and Scedosporium.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Arendrup, 2017, Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations of antifungal agents for conidia forming moulds. EUCAST definitive document E.DEF 9.3.1, EUCAST

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kirchhoff, L., Dittmer, S., Buer, J., Rath, P.-M., & Steinmann, J.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Nuremberg Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Steinmann, Joerg
Venue
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
106105
ISSN
0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3044548032
Cited by
61
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
olorofim, antifungal activity, Scedosporium, Lomentospora prolificans, Exophiala dermatitidis, invasive fungal infections, filamentous fungi, minimum inhibitory concentration, antifungal resistance
MeSH terms
Acetamides, Antifungal Agents, Aspergillus fumigatus, Exophiala, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mycoses, Piperazines, Pyrimidines, Pyrroles, Scedosporium, Eurotiales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review