Cited by 436Antibiotic Use and ResistanceAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaInfection Control in Healthcare

Increased antimicrobial resistance during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Lai, Chih-Cheng, Chen, Shey-Ying, Ko, Wen-Chien, Hsueh, Po-Ren·2021·International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents

Abstract

In addition to SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection itself, an increase in the incidence of antimicrobial resistance poses collateral damage to the current status of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic. There has been a rapid increase in multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, carbapenem-resistant New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), pan-echinocandin-resistant Candida glabrata and multi-triazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus. The cause is multifactorial and is particularly related to high rates of antimicrobial agent utilisation in COVID-19 patients with a relatively low rate of co- or secondary infection. Appropriate prescription and optimised use of antimicrobials according to the principles of antimicrobial stewardship as well as quality diagnosis and aggressive infection control measures may help prevent the occurrence of MDROs during this pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106324

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross-resistance between disinfectants and antimicrobials has been reported for several disinfectants and is associated with a further increase in AMR during the pandemic period.

    “The phenomenon of cross-resistance between disinfectants and antimicrobials has been reported for several disinfectants and is associated with a further increase in AMR during the pandemic period [5, 10, 11].”

    From Profiling the resistome and virulome of Bacillus strains used for probiotic-based sanitation: a multicenter WGS analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The 'Increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance' section reports more multidrug-resistant organisms during the pandemic. However, the paper does not report cross-resistance between disinfectants and antimicrobials or link disinfectant use to that increase; its 'The resolution' section instead discusses disinfection as an infection-control measure. No page numbers are provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • During the COVID-19 pandemic, when chemical disinfection increased, a significant increase in AMR was recorded.

    “Consistent with this, during the COVID-19 pandemic, when chemical disinfection was significantly increased in both sanitary and non-sanitary settings, a significant increase in AMR was recorded [5, 10, 11, 21].”

    From Profiling the resistome and virulome of Bacillus strains used for probiotic-based sanitation: a multicenter WGS analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract and ‘Increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance’ section report increased antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistant organisms during the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper does not establish that chemical disinfection increased significantly in sanitary and non-sanitary settings; its Conclusions instead emphasize increased antimicrobial-agent use as a contributor. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lai, C.-C., Chen, S.-Y., Ko, W.-C., & Hsueh, P.-R.
Affiliations
  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Hsueh, Po-Ren
Venue
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
106324
ISSN
0924-8579 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3136861861
Cited by
436
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 144 · 2022: 102 · 2021: 25
FWCI
9.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance, COVID-19 pandemic, multidrug-resistant organisms, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, Klebsiella pneumoniae, carbapenem resistance, New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase, Acinetobacter baumannii, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Candida glabrata, Aspergillus fumigatus, antimicrobial stewardship, infection control, antimicrobial prescribing, SARS-CoV-2
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, COVID-19, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bacteria, Bacterial Infections, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Drug Utilization, Fungi, Humans, Mycoses, Incidence, Pandemics, Coinfection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review