Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 209

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of phenolic compounds on protein cross-linking and properties of film from fish myofibrillar protein

Prodpran, Thummanoon, Benjakul, Soottawat, Phatcharat, Suttirug·2012·International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
DOI 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The effects of several phenolic ocmpounds (caffeic acid, catechin, ferullic acid and tannic acid) at various concentrations (1, 3 and 5% based on protein) on cross-linking and properties of film from myofibrillar proteins of bigeye snapper (Priacanthus tayenus) were investigated. Among all phenolic compounds used, tannic acid exhibited the highest cross-linking ability on myofibrillar protein as evidenced by higher decrease in free amino groups with coincidentally lower band intensity of myosin heavy chain (MHC). In addition, the extent of protein cross-linking increased with increasing concentration of phenolic compounds. Addition of phenolic compounds could enhance mechanical properties of the resulting films. As phenolic compounds content increased, Young's modulus (E) and tensile strength (TS) of the films increased, while their elongation at break (EAB) decreased (P<0.05), suggesting stronger and stiffer film structure. At the same concentration used, tannic acid rendered the film with higher mechanical properties, compared to others. Phenolic compounds decreased film transparency and affected color of the films differently, depending on types and concentrations used. Films from myofibrillar proteins with and without polyphenol generally had the excellent barrier properties to UV light at the wavelength of 200-800 nm. Therefore, it could potentially be used as inner packaging material for high-fat foods to prevent the lipid oxidation and thus prolonging the shelf-life of…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Gross, 2002, Science, 297, 803, 10.1126/science.297.5582.803 · DOI
  2. Shah, 2008, Biotechnology Advances, 26, 246, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Cuq, 1995, Journal of Food Science, 60, 1369, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb04593.x · DOI
  4. Ahmad, 2012, Food Hydrocolloids, 28, 189, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.12.003 · DOI
  5. Hoque, 2010, Journal of Food Engineering, 96, 66, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.06.046 · DOI
  6. Jongjareonrak, 2008, Food Hydrocolloids, 22, 449, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.01.002 · DOI
  7. Gennadios, 1990, Food Technology, 44, 63
  8. Chinabhark, 2007, Bioresource Technology, 98, 221, 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.11.012 · DOI
  9. Paschoalick, 2003, Food Hydrocolloids, 17, 419, 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00031-6 · DOI
  10. Artharn, 2009, LWT-Food Science and Technology, 42, 1238, 10.1016/j.lwt.2008.08.009 · DOI
  11. Limpan, 2010, Journal of Food Engineering, 100, 85, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.03.031 · DOI
  12. K. Chinabhark, Effect of pH, Lipids and Protein Crosslinkers on the Properties of Surimi Film from Tropical Fish, Master Thesis, Prince of Songkla University, 2005.
  13. Rattaya, 2009, Journal of Food Engineering, 95, 151, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.04.022 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2010, Biomacromolecules, 11, 1125, 10.1021/bm1001284 · DOI
  15. Bigi, 2001, Biomaterials, 22, 763, 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00236-2 · DOI
  16. Cao, 2007, Food Hydrocolloids, 21, 575, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2006.07.001 · DOI
  17. Strauss, 2004, Food Hydrocolloids, 18, 81, 10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00045-6 · DOI
  18. Oudgenoeg, 2001, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemisty, 49, 2503, 10.1021/jf000906o · DOI
  19. Figueroa-Espinoza, 1999, Food Hydrocolloids, 13, 65, 10.1016/S0268-005X(98)00072-1 · DOI
  20. Yan, 1995, Biochemical Journal, 311, 341, 10.1042/bj3110341 · DOI
  21. Benjakul, 2003, Food Chemistry, 82, 567, 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00012-8 · DOI
  22. Shiku, 2003, Fisheries Science, 69, 1026, 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2003.00722.x · DOI
  23. Benjakul, 1997, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45, 3423, 10.1021/jf970294g · DOI
  24. Ellman, 1959, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, 82, 70, 10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6 · DOI
  25. Benjakul, 1997, Journal of Food Science, 62, 729, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb15445.x · DOI
  26. Iwata, 2000, Fisheries Science, 66, 372, 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2000.00057.x · DOI
  27. Laemmli, 1970, Nature, 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Yarnpakdee, 2009, Food Chemistry, 114, 1339, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.014 · DOI
  29. Aewsiri, 2009, Food Chemistry, 117, 160, 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.03.092 · DOI
  30. Balange, 2009, Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 1693, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.01.007 · DOI
  31. S. Prigent, Interactions of Phenolic Compounds with Globular Proteins and their Effects on Food Related Functional Properties, Ph.D. Thesis, The Netherlands, Wageningen University, 2005.
  32. Hayakawa, 1985, Journal of Canadian Institute of Food Science and Technology, 18, 290, 10.1016/S0315-5463(85)71960-8 · DOI
  33. Harrington, 1984, Annual Review of Biochemistry, 53, 35, 10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.000343 · DOI
  34. Rawel, 2002, Food Chemistry, 78, 443, 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00155-3 · DOI
  35. Nuthong, 2009, Food Hydrocolloids, 23, 736, 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2008.08.003 · DOI
  36. Ou, 2005, Journal of Food Engineering, 70, 205, 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.09.025 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Prodpran, T., Benjakul, S., & Phatcharat, S.
Venue
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
51
Issue
5
Pages
774-782
ISSN
0141-8130
DOI
10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.07.010
Cited by
209
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • TRF research scholar program (MRG4880020)
  • Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.