Cited by 14Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchReproductive tract infections researchInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

Risk of myocardial infarction in women with pelvic inflammatory disease

Liou, Tsan-Hon, Wu, Chin-Wen, Hao, Wen-Rui, Hsu, Ming-I, Liu, Ju-Chi, Lin, Hui-Wen·2013·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background There is evidence that chronic inflammation may promote atherosclerotic disease. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a risk marker for myocardial infarction (MI).Method Using the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005 (LHID2005), this cohort study comprised patients with a recorded diagnosis of PID (N=68,668) between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2005, with age-matched controls (1:2) (N=136,906). Each patient was followed-up using entry data until the end of 2006. Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to evaluate the up to 3-year MI-free survival rates, after adjusting for known confounding factors.Results We found that patients with PID were more likely to have MI than the control population after adjusting for potential confounders [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.23-2.81]. When stratified by patient's age, the adjusted HR for MI was 2.09 (95% CI, 1.24-3.52) for patients with PID aged over 55 years. However, the adjusted HR for MI occurring was not significant for patients with PID aged ≤ 55 years.Conclusions PID is a risk marker for MI that is independent of traditional MI risk factors. Further research in this important area of public health is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.01.006

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liou, T.-H., Wu, C.-W., Hao, W.-R., Hsu, M.-I., Liu, J.-C., & Lin, H.-W.
Affiliations
  • Wan Fang Hospital (TW)
  • Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
  • Soochow University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Hui-Wen
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
167
Issue
2
Pages
416-420
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154658026
Cited by
14
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Taipei Medical University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
pelvic inflammatory disease, myocardial infarction, chronic inflammation, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk factors, women, risk indicators, age-stratified analysis
MeSH terms
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Factual, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review