Cited by 203Alcohol Consumption and Health EffectsAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Alcohol intake and risk of stroke: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

Zhang, Chi, Qin, Ying-Yi, Chen, Qi, Jiang, Hong, Chen, Xian-Zhen, Xu, Chun-Li, Mao, Pei-Juan, He, Jia +1 more·2014·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Alcohol intake is inconsistently associated with the risk of stroke morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to summarize the evidence regarding this relationship by using a dose-response meta-analytic approach.Methods We performed electronic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant prospective studies. Only prospective studies that reported effect estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of stroke morbidity and mortality for more than 2 categories of alcohol intake were included.Results We included 27 prospective studies reporting data on 1,425,513 individuals. Low alcohol intake was associated with a reduced risk of total stroke (risk ratio [RR], 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95; P=0.005), ischemic stroke (RR, 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.90; P<0.001), and stroke mortality (RR, 0.67; 95% CI: 0.53-0.85; P=0.001), but it had no significant effect on hemorrhagic stroke. Moderate alcohol intake had little or no effect on the risks of total stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and stroke mortality. Heavy alcohol intake was associated with an increased risk of total stroke (RR, 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01-1.43; P=0.034), but it had no significant effect on hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and stroke mortality.Conclusions Low alcohol intake is associated with a reduced risk of stroke morbidity and mortality, whereas heavy alcohol intake is associated with an increased risk of total stroke. The association between alcohol intake and stroke morbidity and mortality is J-shaped.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.225

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In men, greatest protection from CHD was at 31 g/d, with increased risk beginning at 63 g/d.

    “In a dose-response meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies (275), the association of drinking with CHD was J-shaped: non-drinkers were at slightly increased risk; in men the greatest protection was at 31 g/d with a trend for increased risk beginning at 63 g/d; for women, the greatest protection was at 11 g/d with a trend for increased risk beginning at 14 g/d.”
  • In women, greatest protection from CHD was at 11 g/d, with increased risk beginning at 14 g/d.

    “In a dose-response meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies (275), the association of drinking with CHD was J-shaped: non-drinkers were at slightly increased risk; in men the greatest protection was at 31 g/d with a trend for increased risk beginning at 63 g/d; for women, the greatest protection was at 11 g/d with a trend for increased risk beginning at 14 g/d.”
  • In a dose-response meta-analysis, the association of drinking with CHD was J-shaped.

    “In a dose-response meta-analysis of 24 prospective cohort studies (275), the association of drinking with CHD was J-shaped: non-drinkers were at slightly increased risk; in men the greatest protection was at 31 g/d with a trend for increased risk beginning at 63 g/d; for women, the greatest protection was at 11 g/d with a trend for increased risk beginning at 14 g/d.”
  • In a meta-analysis, no association between light/moderate alcohol use and stroke.

    “In a meta-analysis of 27 prospective studies of alcohol and stroke, no association was found between light or moderate alcohol use and stroke, but heavy alcohol use (>45 g/d) was shown to increase total stroke risk (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.43), particularly hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.71) (275).”
  • Heavy alcohol use (>45 g/d) increased total stroke risk (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.01-1.43), particularly hemorrhagic stroke (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.98-1.71).

    “In a meta-analysis of 27 prospective studies of alcohol and stroke, no association was found between light or moderate alcohol use and stroke, but heavy alcohol use (>45 g/d) was shown to increase total stroke risk (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.43), particularly hemorrhagic stroke (RR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.71) (275).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Qin, Y.-Y., Chen, Q., Jiang, H., Chen, X.-Z., Xu, C.-L., Mao, P.-J., He, J., & Zhou, Y.-H.
Affiliations
  • Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Jia
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
174
Issue
3
Pages
669-677
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090134184
Cited by
203
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
alcohol consumption, stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke mortality, dose-response relationship, heavy drinking, moderate drinking, J-shaped association
MeSH terms
Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Alcoholic Beverages, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review