Cited by 446Health Literacy and Information AccessibilityMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsTechnology Use by Older Adults

New technologies, new disparities: The intersection of electronic health and digital health literacy

Open access
Smith, Benjamin, Magnani, Jared W.·2019·International Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Mobile health, or mHealth, is the implementation of digital health services with mobile and wearable devices, and has ample potential to enhance self-management of chronic conditions, especially cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., blood pressure control and supporting tobacco cessation and physical activity). It remains ambiguous, however, whether such technologies can improve cardiovascular outcomes. More importantly, mHealth carries the additional challenge of digital health literacy, which demands particular skills complementary to general and health literacy. Populations at risk for limited health literacy are similarly vulnerable to having challenges with digital health literacy. We identify such challenges and outline solutions to improve access to digital health services and their use for individuals with limited digital health literacy. We present an 18-point "Digital Universal Precautions" as a mandate for health care organizations committed towards addressing and facilitating eHealth literacy. As health care institutions increasingly advance mHealth through delivery of on-line material and patient portals, they face the challenge of ensuring that digital health services and content are available to all patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.066

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The influence of digital literacy on the use of mHealth apps becomes much stronger when combined with experience with mHealth apps.

    “In other words, the influence of individuals’ digital literacy on the use of mHealth apps becomes much stronger when combined with their experience with mHealth apps.80,81”

    From The influence of digital literacy on mHealth app usability: The mediating role of patient expertise (2024) · cites this paper as [81]

    The Abstract and “Limited digital health literacy: disparities in access and guidance” section link digital literacy challenges to difficulty using digital health services and apps. They do not say that experience with mHealth apps makes digital literacy’s influence on app use stronger; searches for app experience and an interaction found no such finding. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]Health Literacy Online: 2nd Edition Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, B., & Magnani, J. W.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Magnani, Jared W.
Venue
International Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
292
Pages
280-282
ISSN
0167-5273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947323400
Cited by
446
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 104 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2
FWCI
40.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R61HL144669, R01HL143010)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
mobile health, digital health literacy, health literacy, e-health, digital divide, cardiovascular risk factors, chronic disease self-management, patient portals, wearable devices
MeSH terms
Humans, Telemedicine, Healthcare Disparities, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review